MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W56981587

Citizenship and Education in Liberal-Democratic Societies: Teaching for Cosmopolitan Values and Collective Identities

2003· book· en· W56981587 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typebook
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicReligious Education and Schools
Canadian institutionsMcGill University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsLiberalismCosmopolitanismLiberal educationPolitical scienceMulticulturalismPluralism (philosophy)DemocracySociologyCitizenshipCivil societyLawGender studiesHigher educationLiberal arts educationPolitics
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Introduction: Liberalism and the Dilemma of Public Education in Multicultural Societies COSMOPOLITANISM, LIBERALISM, AND COMMON EDUCATION 1. Teaching Cosmopolitan Right 2. Liberal Education: The United States Example 3. Pluralism, Personal Identity, and Freedom of Conscience 4. Between State and Civil Society: European Contexts for Education 5. The Burdens and Dilemmas of Common Schooling 6. Should We Teach Patriotic History? LIBERALISM AND TRADITIONALIST EDUCATION 7. Comprehensive Educations and the Liberal Understanding of Autonomy 8. Citizenship as Identity, Citizenship as Shared Fate, and the Functions of Multiculatural Education 9. Civic Friendship and Democratic Education 10. Schooling and Cultural Maintenance for Religious Minorities in the Liberal State LIBERAL CONSTRAINTS ON TRADITIONALIST EDUCATION 11. Multicultural Accomodations in Education 12. 'Mistresses of Their Own Destiny': Group Rights, Gender, and Realistic Rights of Exit 13. Multinational Civic Education 14. Religious Education in Liberal Democratic Societies: The Question of Accountability and Autonomy 15. Liberalism and Group Identities

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Direct model labels (unvalidated)

Per-model category and study-design labels from the labeling rounds. They are machine output, unvalidated, and the disagreement between models ships as data. No study design here is MEDLINE-validated yet.

Model armCategoriesStudy designConfidence
gemmano category
Domain: not available · Genre: Other
About the Canadian research system: no · About a Canadian topic: no
Theoretical or conceptuallow
gptno category
Domain: not available · Genre: Other
About the Canadian research system: no · About a Canadian topic: no
Not applicablelow
models splitAgreement compares identical category sets and study designs across arms.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.958
Threshold uncertainty score0.806

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.020
GPT teacher head0.339
Teacher spread0.319 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Quick stats

Citations99
Published2003
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicReligious Education and SchoolsFrench-language works237,207