Effects of lercanidipine on coronary reactivity and myocardial remodeling in transition to heart failure in cardiomyopathic hamsters.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
AIM: Lercanidipine is a new vasoselective dihydropyridine calcium channel blocker with a short plasma half-life, long duration of action, and demonstrated cardioprotective properties. We hypothesized that it might be effective at attenuating the adverse impact observed on the coronary compartment and myocardium in the transition phase to heart failure in the UM-X7.1 cardiomyopathic (CM) hamster. METHODS: The effects of 4-month exposure to lercanidipine 3 and 10 mg/kg (daily oral administration) were evaluated in 150-day-old CM hamsters and in age-matched normal hamsters. Coronary reactivity (reactive hyperemia to 30-s coronary occlusion) and the response to the administration of acetylcholine (100 nmol/L) and sodium nitroprusside (1 micromol/L) were assessed monthly, using the isolated perfused heart model. The left ventricular chamber dilatation index and wall thickness, myocardial fibrosis and myocardial capillary density (papillary muscle) were estimated in selected subgroups at monthly intervals. RESULTS: High-dose lercanidipine had beneficial effects on coronary dysfunctions: at month 4 of the treatment period, reactive hyperemia to short duration ischemia was improved, as was the endothelium-dependent vasodilator response (acetylcholine=68 %+/-16 % vs 11 %+/-5 % in untreated CM hamsters, P<0.05) and endothelium-independent vasodilator response (sodium nitroprusside=36 %+/-5 % vs 22 %+/-12 % in untreated CM hamsters, P<0.05). Capillary density averaged 10,879+/-474 capillaries per mm2 in papillary muscle from normal hamsters; this value did not change over time in normal hamsters and was not affected during the transition phase to heart failure in CM hamsters. Lercanidipine preserved myocardial capillary density in these conditions. Chronic exposure to lercanidipine had no impact on myocardial remodeling observed in CM hamsters. CONCLUSION: Lercanidipine had a beneficial impact on the coronary compartment in the transition phase to heart failure in a model of dilated cardiomyopathy.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".