MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W570443720

International environmental law in national courts

2004· book· en· W570443720 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Cairo A. R. Robb, Alice Palmer

Bibliographic record

VenueCambridge University Press eBooks · 2004
Typebook
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicEnvironmental law and policy
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsGeographyCommonwealthChristian ministryTourismPolitical scienceEnvironmental protectionArchaeologyLaw
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Preface Table of cases reported Digest Table of treaties Argentina: Provincia de la Pampa v. Provincia de Mendoza (1987) Australia: Commonwealth of Australia v. State of Tasmania (1983) Leatch v. National Parks and Wildlife Service & Shoalhaven City Council (1993) Canada: R. v. Crown Zellerbach Canada Ltd. (1988) Friends of the Oldman River Society v. Canada (Minister of Transport) (1992) Daishowa Inc. v. Friends of the Lubicon (1998) 114957 Canada Ltee (Spraytech, Societe d'Arrosage) & Services des Espaces Verts Ltee/Chemlawn v. Town of Hudson (2001) Chile: Palza Corvacho v. Director of Irrigation of the First Region (1985) Pedro Flores v. Codelco, Division Salvador (1988) Colombia: Fundepublico v. Mayor of Bugalagrande (1992) Fundepublico v. Tradenet de Colombia SA (1994) Jaime Cordoba Trivio (Representing the U'wa Indigenous Peoples) v. Ministry of Environment & Sociedad Occidental de Colombia Inc. (1997) Costa Rica: Chacon v. Ministry of Health & Municipality of Santa Ana (1993) Caribbean Conservation Corporation v. Costa Rica (1999) Vasquez v. Ministry of Environment and Energy (Oil Exploration in the Caribbean Case) (2000) Finland: Protected Bird Eggs Case (1989) France: Rhine 'Salt War' Cases NV PWN v. State Minister of the Environment (1983) Les Mines de Potasse d'Alsace v. Province of Northern Holland (1986) Province of Northern Holland v. The State (1989) NV PWN v. Minister of Planning and Environment (2000) Germany: Lingen Nuclear Power Plant Case (1986) Greece: Hellenic Ornithological Society v. Minister of National Economy and Tourism ('Acheloos River Case') (1994) Hellenic Society for the Protection of Environment and Cultural Heritage v. Minister for the Environment, Land-Use Planning and Public Works ('Tinos Case') (1995) Hungary: Protected Areas Case (No. 28 of 1994) (1994) India: M.C. Mehta v. Union of India (1987) Indian Council for Enviro-Legal Action v. Union of India (1996) Vellore Citizens Welfare Forum v. Union of India (1996) M.C. Mehta v. Kamal Nath (1996) Italy: Ministry of Internal Affairs v. Patmos Shipping Corporation (1989) Japan: Kayano v. Hokkaido Expropriation Committee (1997) Malaysia: Kajing Tubek v. Ekran Bhd. (1996) Nepal: Surya Prasad Sharma Dhungel on Behalf of Leaders Inc. Pvt. Ltd. v. Godavari Marble Industries, Pvt. Ltd. (1994) Gopal Siwakoti v. Ministry of Finance (1994) Netherlands: Rhine 'Salt War' Cases: Mines de Potasse d'Alsace SA v. Onroed Goed Maatschappij Bier B.V. (1983, 1986, 1988) Sondermullbeseitigung Franz Seifermann Gmbh te Rheinau (Brd) v. Minister of Transport, Public Works and Water Management (1989) G.P.J. Zwiers v. Gedeputeerde Staten van Gelderland (1993) Norway: Ellingsen & Bendiksen v. Fisheries Department in the name of the State (1997) Pakistan: Zia v. Pakistan Water and Power Development Authority (1994) Philippines: Juan Antonio Oposa v. Secretary of the Department of Environment and Natural Resources (1993) Laguna Lake Development Authority v. Court of Appeals, Caloocan City (1994) South Africa: Van Huyssteen v. Minister of Environmental Affairs and Tourism (1995) Director, Mineral Development, Gauteng Region v. Save The Vaal Environment (1999) Sri Lanka: Bulankulama v. Ministry of Industrial Development (2000) Tanzania Joseph D Kessy v. City Council of Dar es Salaam (1991) Turkey: Senih OEzay v. Ministry of the Environment, Ankara (1997) United Kingdom R. v. Secretary of State for Foreign and Commonwealth Affairs ex parte World Development Movement Ltd. (1994) R. v. Secretary of State for Trade and Industry, ex p. Greenpeace Ltd (1999) R. (on the Application of Amvac Chemical UK Ltd.) v. Secretary of State for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs (2001) United States of America: State of Missouri v. Holland (1920) Tennessee Valley Authority v. Hill (1978) Environmental Defense Fund, Inc

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.979
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.016
GPT teacher head0.228
Teacher spread0.213 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations6
Published2004
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCambridge University Press eBooksSame topicEnvironmental law and policyFrench-language works237,207