MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W571339978

Route 1 Gateway Project - New Brunswick's Latest Challenge

2012· article· en· W571339978 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
H Varjabedian, D Clowater

Bibliographic record

Venue2012 CONFERENCE AND EXHIBITION OF THE TRANSPORTATION ASSOCIATION OF CANADA - TRANSPORTATION: INNOVATIONS AND OPPORTUNITIES · 2012
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicStructural Engineering and Vibration Analysis
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsScheduleGeneral partnershipTransport engineeringRoad constructionProject managementEngineeringCivil engineeringBusinessFinanceComputer science
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In 2009, NBDOT started the process for the submissions of the Design, Build, and Finance, Operation, Maintenance and Rehabilitation of Route 1 from the US Border at St. Stephen to Petitcodiac, along the south coast of New Brunswick. Route 1 is an arterial highway which links New Brunswick to the New England States and is a major trade corridor. The economic benefits of upgrading Route 1 are significant to the Province of New Brunswick as well as the other Maritime Provinces. Dexter Development General Partnership (DDGP) was awarded the contract to complete the design and build of upgrading the remaining 55 kilometres of Route 1 to a 4-lane highway, and to rehabilitate another 180 kilometres of existing 4-lane highway infrastructure including roads, bridges, and safety improvements. The Project also includes an operation, maintenance and rehabilitation agreement for the same corridor until 2040. The construction and rehabilitation phases of the project are to be completed within a three year period (completion date of July 2013). This paper will provide overview of the project, the management structure, design process, construction phase, and environmental issues encountered during the Project including an aggressive construction schedule, difficult soil conditions, significant river crossings, managing large storm events, and re-alignment around a previously unknown archaeological site with significant artifacts. This paper will provide additional details of this project from all aspects including construction, environmental, quality, safety and overall project management of the Project from an Owner's and a Developer's perspective. For teh covering abstract of this conference see ITRD record number 201211RT334E.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.820
Threshold uncertainty score0.984

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.029
GPT teacher head0.212
Teacher spread0.183 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2012
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venue2012 CONFERENCE AND EXHIBITION OF THE TRANSPORTATION ASSOCIATION OF CANADA - TRANSPORTATION: INNOVATIONS AND OPPORTUNITIESSame topicStructural Engineering and Vibration AnalysisFrench-language works237,207