MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W572668261

Experimental Design Based Evaluation of Sensitivities of Mechanistic-Empirical Pavement Design Guide (MEPDG) Predictions for Ontario's Local Calibration

2014· article· en· W572668261 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
GE Jannat, Sl Tighe

Bibliographic record

VenueTransportation 2014: Past, Present, Future - 2014 Conference and Exhibition of the Transportation Association of Canada // Transport 2014 : Du passé vers l'avenir - 2014 Congrès et Exposition de 'Association des transports du Canada · 2014
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicAsphalt Pavement Performance Evaluation
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsInternational Roughness IndexRutSubgradeFatigue crackingCrackingAsphalt concreteEngineeringCalibrationAsphaltStructural engineeringDeformation (meteorology)Sensitivity (control systems)Civil engineeringGeotechnical engineeringEnvironmental scienceSurface finishMaterials scienceMechanical engineeringComposite material
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A Mechanistic-Empirical Pavement Design Guide (MEPDG) was developed under NCHRP Project 1-37A to address the shortcomings of empirical pavement design methods. The MEPDG uses mechanistic-empirical models to analyze the impacts of traffic, climate, materials and pavement structure and to predict long term performances of pavement. The MEPDG software (AASHTOWare Pavement M-E) use a three-level hierarchical input scheme to predict pavement performance in terms of terminal International Roughness Index (IRI), Permanent Deformation , Total Cracking (Reflective and Alligator), Asphalt Concrete (AC) Thermal Fracture, AC Bottom-Up Fatigue Cracking, and AC Top-Down Fatigue Cracking. Different highway agencies are taking initiatives to adopt MEPDG based pavement design and performance prediction by calibrating the prediction models for their local conditions. However, these inputs with different levels of accuracy may have significant impact on performance prediction and thereby on accuracy of local calibration. This study focuses on the sensitivity of the input parameters of MEPDG distresses to identify the effect of the accuracy level of input parameters based on orthogonal experimental design. A local sensitivity analysis is carried out by using Ontario’s default value and historical performance record of Ontario highway system. Sensitive input parameters are evaluated through a multiple regression analysis for respective distresses. It is found that terminal IRI is sensitive to initial IRI, initial permanent deformation, and milled thickness in asphalt layer; permanent deformation is sensitive to initial permanent deformation, subgrade resilient modulus, and traffic load; top down fatigue cracking is sensitive to AC effective binder content, and AC air voids. Based on the independent influence of these sensitive inputs, the requirement of accuracy level will be identified for MEPDG design.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.005
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.011
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.904
Threshold uncertainty score0.191

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0050.011
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.017
GPT teacher head0.237
Teacher spread0.221 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2014
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueTransportation 2014: Past, Present, Future - 2014 Conference and Exhibition of the Transportation Association of Canada // Transport 2014 : Du passé vers l'avenir - 2014 Congrès et Exposition de 'Association des transports du CanadaSame topicAsphalt Pavement Performance EvaluationFrench-language works237,207