Bibliographic record
Abstract
Dans le cadre d’une etude terminometrique plus generale sur l’adoption des neologismes relatifs a l’industrie automobile, nous nous sommes demandes dans quelle mesure la conservation de l’etiquetage anglo-saxon dans les vehicules vendus au Quebec porte sur les habitudes lexicales des jeunes conducteurs francophones de la province, et donc peut entraver la francisation a l’oral des signifiants representes par les symboles graphiques anglais. Conscients du rapport semiologique privilegie entre l’abreviation graphique retenue et la premiere lettre du mot evoque, d’ou le terme « initiales » au feminin, (« lettres initiales »), nous avancons l’hypothese qu’en regle generale, les graphies anglo-americaines imposees a l’interieur des vehicules imposent a leur tour les anglo-americanismes terminologiques dont elles sont les symboles alphabetiques. En effet, elles constituent des obstacles a la francisation a cause de leur valeur associative aux termes representes.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".