The History and Methodology of Law and Economics
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Introductory books introductory articles monographs book reviews symposia collection of (new) articles readers doctoral or masters theses organization of research and teaching, Claus Ott and Tina Neuling history of law and economics, Ejan Mackaay law and economics in Austria, Wolfgang Weigel law and economics in Belgium, Gerrit De Geest law and economics in Denmark, Henrik Lando law and economics in Finland, Risto Nuolimaa and Pekka Timonen law and economics in France, Lionel Montagne law and economics in Germany, Roland Kirstein law and economics in Greece, Aristedes N. Hatzis law and economics in Hungary, Andras Sajo and Kinga Petervari law and economics in Italy, Roberto Pardolesi and Guideppe Bellantuono law and economics in Mexico, Andres Roemer and Jose Diego Valades law and economics in the Netherlands, Rudi W. Holzhauer and Rob Teijl law and economics in Norway, Erling Eide law and economics in Portugal, Miguel Moura e Silva law and economics in Quebec, Frederick Charette law and economics in Taiwan, Steven S. Kan law and economics in Serbia, Zeliko Sevic law and economics in Spain, Santos Pastor and Jesus Pintos law and economics in Sweden, Goran Skogh law and economics in Switzerland methodology - general, Heico Kerkmeester schools - general, Ejan Mackaay Austrian school institutional law and economics, Steven G. Medema, Nicholas Mercuro and Warren J. Samuels new institutional economics, Peter G. Klein property rights approach game theory applied to law comparative law and economics, Ugo A. Mattei, Luisa Antoniolli and Andrea Rossato experimental law and economics, Richard H. McAdams law and economics of development, Edardo Buscaglia public choice, constitutional political economy, and law and economics, Ludwig Van den Hauwe law and macroeconomics, Richard L. Gordon other sociological approaches, Ian R. Macneil the law and economics of anthropology, Robert Cooter new economic history and law and economics, Alexander J. Field critical legal studies, Wayne Eastman rational choice theory in law and economics, Thomas S. Ulen the endowment effect, Christopher Curran the coase theorem, Steven G. Medema and Richard O. Zerbe, Jr. transaction costs, Douglas W. Allen public goods and club goods, Patrick McNutt network externalities, William H. Page and John E. Lopatka path dependence, Stan J. Liebowitz and Stephen E. Margolis non-legal sanctions, Stephen Panther legal error, Warren F. Schwartz norms and values in law and economics, Denis J. Brion general structure of the law, Donald Wittman.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.011 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.003 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".