Use of Glass FRP Reinforcing Bars instead of Steel Bars in CRCP in Quebec
Bibliographic record
Abstract
In North America, there is a persistent problem of the deterioration of steel-reinforced concrete which has limited the service life and increased the maintenance cost of such structures. The first Canadian continuous reinforced concrete pavement (CRCP) built on a highway was constructed in 2000 in the province of Quebec. Some cores taken in the first CRCP section five years after construction were already showing some corrosion in the longitudinal reinforcement at the crack location. Many options were then analysed in 2005 to resolve this problem and galvanised steel was selected as reinforcement for the next projects. One other non-corrosive reinforcement alternative is glass fibre reinforced polymer (GFRP). Fifteen (15) slab sections over an area of 150 m in three-lanes of Highway 40 Eastbound in Montreal (Quebec) were constructed using the newly developed CRCP system with GFRP reinforcement. In addition, 3 slab sections were reinforced using steel bars for comparison purposes. The main objective of this research project is to implement the technology and design of GFRP reinforcing bars in order to demonstrate their ability to meet all CRCP requirements.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".