CONSIDERATIONS ON URBAN FORMATION AND DIVISION OF HOUSING LOTS OF PARAMARIBO, SURINAME
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Clarifying the block formation and division of housing lots in Paramaribo, this paper discusses the influence and modification of Dutch colonial city planning in Suriname. Paramaribo is one of the uniquely preserved Dutch colonial towns in Caribbean Regions. With numerous historical buildings and wooden houses, Paramaribo was registered as one of the UNESCO World Cultural Heritage sites in 2002. This paper is based on the research project that had been launched under the title 'Field Research on Origin, Transformation, Conversion and Conservation of Urban Space of Colonial Cities', the major target of which are the Dutch colonial cities. To compare the colonial cities all over the world is ambitious objective of the project. The Dutch is well known as a developer of high densed settlement and townhouses. One of the major focuses of this paper is to clarify how the Dutch planned the block and housing lots in Paramaribo. The paper firstly studies the history of the process of establishment and development of Paramaribo and the considerations on the block formation and division of housing lots. Analyzing historical maps in terms of the block formation planned in the late 18th century, this paper clarifies that the planning of the blocks was based on the unit of measurement called Rijinlandse Roede. And from the comparison with the grid pattern of Cape Town, South Africa, this paper points out the relevance of the city planning between Paramaribo and Cape Town.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".