First Nations leadership and spirituality within the Royal Commission on Aboriginal Peoples : a Saskatchewan perspective
Bibliographic record
Abstract
I recall a motivational lesson that I did with my students a few years ago.We came up with "P" words essential for success.Those words included: preparation, planning, practice, persistence, perseverance, patience, and prayer.I had stretched the "P" rule by adding "em-powerment."These past two years, in the process of obtaining my Masters degree in education, I have had to put these words into action in ways I could never have imagined.Ultimately, I have achieved the success by achieving a goal, and, in turn, have become empowered.I do not believe that dreams are realized alone.I have had many people believe in me and support me emotionally and spiritually throughout this wonderful, but challenging, experience.They have exhibited the extraordinary qualities of patience and love.At this time I would like to express sincere and deep appreciation for the people who have encouraged me to "be the best that I could be."Dr. Vivian Hajnal has graciously offered her encouragement, understanding, and wisdom.I am grateful for the opportunity to have had Vivian
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.019 | 0.011 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.007 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.004 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.004 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".