Pluralisme et citoyenneté : Le discours de la première génération d'immigrants haïtiens de Montréal
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Face a la realite de l'immigration et au defi qu'elle pose a la plupart des societes industrialisees contemporaines, on assiste depuis peu a l'emergence d'un debat portant sur la fragilite de la cohesion nationale. Le Canada, bien que reconnaissant officiellement la diversite culturelle comme l'un des poles de son identite collective, souhaite aujourd'hui formuler de nouvelles propositions du vivre ensemble . La nature du discours social dans la province du Quebec est tout aussi identique : apres s'etre employe a definir pendant de nombreuses annees le terrain relationnel de la majorite francophone et des minorites issues de l'immigration, le Quebec invite desormais tous ses residents, quelle que soit leur origine, a participer a un meme projet national et a devenir des citoyens quebecois . L'etat des connaissances sur la vision immigrante de ces recentes reorientations ideologiques demeure trop fragmentaire. La presente these vise ainsi a recueillir les perceptions d'une population etablie a Montreal et dite visible , la population haitienne, sur la societe pluraliste quebecoise et en particulier sur le theme de la citoyennete comme nouvelle solution gestionnaire des rapports sociaux. Que signifie en effet la citoyennete quebecoise pour les membres de la communaute haitienne immigres au cours des annees 1960 et 1970 ? Au regard de leurs experiences de socialisation heterogenes, tres souvent dictees par des formes diffuses de discrimination, quels types de liens sont-ils a present susceptibles de developper a l'egard de la societe civile, de la nation et de l'Etat ? Ce sont a ces questions essentielles que nous tenterons de repondre.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.016 | 0.010 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.005 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.004 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.006 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".