MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W577542446

Neueste Erkenntnisse zur "Durchgehend Bewehrten Betondecke" / Latest findings on the construction type "Continuously Reinforced Concrete Pavement"

2010· article· de· W577542446 on OpenAlex
Solange Aparecida de Oliveira Hoeller

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueStrasse Und Autobahn · 2010
Typearticle
Languagede
FieldEngineering
TopicCivil and Structural Engineering Research
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHumanitiesReinforced concretePolitical sciencePhysicsArtEngineeringStructural engineering
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Betondecken koennen grundsaetzlich in zwei Varianten ausgefuehrt werden: als unbewehrte Platten und Durchgehend Bewehrt (DBBD). In Deutschland wird die unbewehrte Plattenbauweise mit verduebelten Querscheinfugen im Abstand von 5 m standardisiert angewendet. Bei der DBBD werden keine Querfugen in der Betondecke hergestellt, sondern es stellt sich ein freies Rissbild mit schmalen Plattenstreifen ein. Um eine Querkraftuebertragung zu sichern, ist die Rissoeffnungsweite zu beschraenken. Dies wird durch die Anordnung einer durchgehenden Laengsbewehrung erreicht. Zahlreiche Anwendungen haben gezeigt, dass bei dieser Fahrbahn der Fahrkomfort wesentlich hoeher ist, die Konstruktion ein sehr gutes Tragverhalten aufweist und eine lange Nutzungsdauer erreicht wird. Daraus ergibt sich eine sehr wirtschaftliche, langlebige und unterhaltungsarme Bauweise. Es fehlt noch eine Optimierung der Bauweise fuer die konkrete Anwendung in Deutschland. Dazu wurden 10 Strecken mit 17 Abschnitten in Belgien, den Niederlanden, der Schweiz, Deutschland, Polen und Kanada fuer eine vergleichende Betrachtung ausgewaehlt und die Anforderungswerte und Einbaubedingungen zusammengetragen. Es erfolgten Streckenbegehungen, bei denen die vorhandenen Risse mit Lage und Oeffnungsweite bestimmt wurden. Der Zustand der Strecken wurde visuell begutachtet. Auf der Grundlage dieser Informationen wurden die Strecken verglichen. Es konnten weiterfuehrende Erkenntnisse ueber das Rissverhalten der DBBD gewonnen werden. Darueber hinaus werden Anforderungen an die Herstellung einer DBBD und der weiteren Anwendung benannt. (A) ABSTRACT IN ENGLISH: In 1920, the first Continuously Reinforced Concrete Pavement (CRCP) was produced in the USA. In Europe, this type of construction was first applied in Belgium in 1948. Until now in more than 30 countries more than 50,000 km of CRCP have been built. These implementations have shown that the driving comfort on such roads is much higher than on standard roads in Germany, which are based on non-reinforced plates with a length of 5 m, and that the structures have a better carrying performance and longer service lives. This results in a very economic, long-lasting structure with low maintenance costs. Such construction types will in future be needed to handle the consistently increasing traffic load with a high heavy-traffic component in Central Europe and specifically in Germany. However, for a variety of reasons, this construction type has not been used in Germany in the past. It has only been considered during the last 12 years. Three routes have been built and more are in the planning stage. To date, not all the open questions concerning this construction type could be answered from our own experience. For this reason, 10 routes in Belgium, Switzerland, the Netherlands, Poland, Canada and Germany with a total of 17 sections were selected, investigated and compared. The results of this comparison and the resulting findings are presented in the report. Finally, recommendations for the further application of CRCP in Germany are provided. (A)

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Research integrity, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.603
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.010
GPT teacher head0.238
Teacher spread0.228 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it