Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
PART I: FRAMEWORKS The Discursive Framing of Phonological Acts of Identity: Welshness through English N.Coupland A Sociolinguistics of `Double-Consciousness': English and Ethnicity in the Black Experience A.A.Mazrui Basic English, Chinglish, and Translocal Dialect Y.Huang PART II: REPRESENTATIONS Representing Jewish Identity through English C.Goldin Bernstein Linguistic Displays of Identity among Dominicans in National and Diasporic Settings A.J.Toribio PART III:CONTEXTS Speaking for Ourselves: Indigenous Cultural Integrity and Continuance S.J.Ortiz English and the Construction of Aboriginal Identities in the Eastern Canadian Arctic D.Patrick Constructing a Diaspora Identity in English: The Case of Sri LankanTamils A.S.Canagarajah PART IV: CONNECTIONS Teaching English among Linguistically Diverse Students J.Bough Playing with Race in Transnational Space: Rethinking Mestizaje M.Farr African American Vernacular English: Roots and Branches J.Rickford Race and Ethnicity in the English-speaking World J.Brutt-Griffler
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it