Bibliographic record
Abstract
U.N. RESPONSE TO AL-QAEDA INTRODUCTION A. U.N. SECURITY COUNCIL RESOLUTIONS COMMENTARY ON U.N. SECURITY COUNCIL RESOLUTIONS 1. Resolution 1267 (1999) UN Security Council, S/RES/1267 (1999) October 15, 1999 2. Resolution 1333 (2000) UN Security Council, S/RES/1333 (2000) December 19, 2000 3. Resolution 1390 (2002) UN Security Council, S/RES/1390 (2002) January 28, 2002 4. Resolution 1452 (2002) UN Security Council, S/RES/1452 (2002) December 20, 2002 5. Resolution 1455 (2003) UN Security Council, S/RES/1455 (2003) January 17, 2003 6. Resolution 1617 (2005) UN Security Council, S/RES/1617 (2005) July 29, 2005 7. Resolution 1730 (2006) UN Security Council, S/RES/1730 (2006) December 19, 2006 8. Resolution 1735 (2006) UN Security Council, S/RES/1735 (2006) December 22, 2006 9. Resolution 1822 (2008) UN Security Council, S/RES/1822 (2008) June 30, 2008 B. REGIONAL RESPONSES COMMENTARY ON REGIONAL RESPONSES 1. Council of the European Union Common Position 1999/727/CFSP November 15, 1999 2. Council of the European Union Regulation (EC) No. 337/2000 February 14, 2000 3. Council Regulation No. 467/2001 (March 6, 2001) and Council Regulation No. 881/2002 May 27, 2002 C. JUDICIAL REVIEW: 1267 JURISPRUDENCE COMMENTARY ON JUDICIAL REVIEW: 1267 JURISPRUDENCE 1. Kadi v. Council and Commission T-315/01, Decision of the Court of First Instance September 21, 2005 2. Ayadi v. Council T-253/02, Decision of the Court of First Instance July 12, 2006 3. Hassan v. Council and Commission T-49/04, Decision of the Court of First Instance July 12, 2006 4. Mollendorf C-117/06, Decision by the European Court of Justice upon request for Preliminary Ruling by Germany October 17, 2007 5. Nada v. SECO State Secretariat for Economic Affairs (Swiss Federal Supreme Court) November 14, 2007 6. Opinion of Advocate General Poiares Maduro On Case C-402/5 P, Kadi v. Council of the European Union and 7. Commission of the European Communities January 16, 2008 8. Kadi v. Council Consolidated C-402/05 P & C-415/05 P Decision by the European Court of Justice September 3, 2008 9. Sayadi/Vinck v. Belgium UN Human Rights Committee Decision CCPR/C/94/D/1472/2006 December 29, 2008 10. Abdelrazik v. Minister of Foreign Affairs and Attorney General of Canada T-727-08, Decision of the Federal Court of Canada June 4, 2009 11. Othman v. Council T-318/01, Decision of the Court of First Instance June 11, 2009 12. Hay v. HM Treasury and Secretary of State for Foreign and Commonwealth Affairs [2009] EWHC 1677, Decision of the UK High Court of Justice July 10, 2009 D. RESPONSES TO LEGAL CASES COMMENTARY ON RESPONSES TO LEGAL CASES 1. Notice to Uthman Omar Mahmoud, Listed Individual Commission of the European Communities April 3, 2009 2. Proposal to Amend Regulation 881 Commission of the European Communities April 22, 2009 3. Guidelines of the [1267] Committee for the Conduct of its Work The U.N. Security Council's Committee on Taliban and Al-Qaeda Sanctions December 9, 2008 E. REPORTS BY EXTERNAL BODIES COMMENTARY ON RESPONSES TO EXTERNAL BODIES 1. Report of the UN High Commissioner for Human Rights On the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms While Countering Terrorism March 9, 2007 CONCLUSION
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.003 | 0.014 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.009 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.007 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.003 | 0.003 |
| Research integrity | 0.026 | 0.019 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.140 | 0.102 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".