MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W58433210

Promoting emotional education : engaging children and young people with social, emotional and behavioural difficulties

2009· book· en· W58433210 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Carmel Cefai, Paul Cooper

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typebook
Languageen
FieldPsychology
TopicEducational and Psychological Assessments
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsNature versus nurtureCompetence (human resources)PsychologyThe artsNarrativePedagogySociologySocial psychologyArtVisual arts
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Introduction. Chapter 1. Emotional Education: Connecting With Students' Thoughts and Emotions. Carmel Cefai, University of Malta, and Paul Cooper, University of Leicester, UK. Part 1: Listening To Students' Voices. Chapter 2. The Perspectives of Young People With SEBD about Educational Provision. Frances Toynbee, Huntington School, York. Chapter 3. The Narratives of Secondary School Students with SEBD. Carmel Cefai and Paul Cooper. Chapter 4. The Perspectives of Ex-Students on Their Experiences at a School For SEBD. Damian Spiteri, College of Arts, Science and Technology, Malta. Chapter 5. The Perspectives of Students on Personal and Social Development in School. Mark G. Borg, University of Malta and Andrew Triganza Scott, PSD Teachers Association, Malta. Part 2: Mobilising Peer Support. Chapter 6. Peer Support Challenges School Bullying. Helen Cowie, University of Surrey, UK. Chapter 7. Classwide Peer Tutoring and Students With SEBD. Anastasia Karagiannakis and Ingrid Sladeczek, Both of Mcgill University, Canada. Chapter 8. Students with SEBD as Peer Helpers. Claire Beaumont, University of Laval, Quebec, Canada. Chapter 9. Circle Time and Socio-Emotional Competence in Children and Young People. Jenny Mosley, Quality Circle Time Consultancy. Part 3: Working With Students' Emotions. Chapter 10. Nurture Groups: An Evaluation of the Evidence. Paul Cooper. Chapter 11. Nurture Groups: Early Relationships and Mental Health. Marion Bennathan, Chair of the Nurture Group Network, UK. Chapter 12. Kangaroo Groups: An Adaptation of Nurture Groups. Caroline Couture, Universite Du Quebec A Trois-Rivieres, Canada. Chapter 13: Aggression Replacement Training: Decreasing Behaviour Problems by Increasing Emotional Competence. Knut Gundersen and Frode Svartdal, Both of Diakonhjemmet University College Rogaland, Norway. Chapter 14. From the Needs of Children to the Need for Children: Contemporary Values and their Implications for the Social and Emotional Well Being of Children. Paul Cooper and Carmel Cefai. The Contributors. Index

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.069
Threshold uncertainty score0.232

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0020.002
Open science0.0010.002
Research integrity0.0020.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0690.020

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.024
GPT teacher head0.317
Teacher spread0.294 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations32
Published2009
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicEducational and Psychological AssessmentsFrench-language works237,207