Genetics of adolescent idiopathic scoliosis in the post-genome-wide association study era.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Recently, analyses of a genome-wide association study (GWAS) conducted in a Japanese population found several common susceptibility variants associated with adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS) (1-3). The top variants identified from this GWAS reside in genomic regions with potentially etiologically relevant genes and have been replicated across multiple populations and ethnicities. As a result, genes involved in biological pathways that are now viewed as promising targets for downstream functional investigation include abnormal somatosensory function ( LBX1 ) (1), delayed ossification of the developing spine ( GPR126 ) (2), skeletal dysplasia ( SOX9 ) (3) and scoliosis associated with syndromic disease ( KCNJ2 ) (3), One of these variants, a single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) in the 3’-flanking region of the LBX1 gene (rs11190878) (1), has been consistently replicated in several independent populations (4). Other GWASes have also identified novel AIS-associated variants, with some overlap among the top ranked SNPs, including rs11190878 (Albertsen et al ., 2014, ASHG conference abstract) (5).
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".