MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W58503851

The Case of Missing Boundaries: the Postmodern Design of Buero Vallejo's "Lázaro en el laberinto"

2005· article· es· W58503851 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

venuePublished in a venue whose home country is Canada.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueRevista Canadiense de Estudios Hispánicos · 2005
Typearticle
Languagees
FieldPsychology
TopicHistorical and Modern Theater Studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHumanitiesArtDramaPostmodernismVisual artsLiterature
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Este articulo muestra la ex?tencia de una tendencia posmoderna en el teatro de Buero Vallejo mediante un an?lisis de la ambig?edad temporal y espacial de L? zaro en el laberinto (1986). Buero Vallejo se empe?a en romper con el uso tradi cional del espacio y del tiempo como marcos de referencia habituales y medios de crear una narrativa coherente y totalizadora. La realidad, seg?n sugiere el t?tulo del drama, se presenta de manera desconectada. La acci?n del drama se desa rrolla simult?neamente en espacios distintos, y el presente y el pasado se (con funden con el objetivo de rechazar toda verdad absoluta y subvertir la noci?n de un punto focal estable. Ausencia y presencia, pasado y presente, rememoraci?n y olvido se entrecruzan para desafiar la validez del conocimiento ontol?gico y des estabilizar la narrativa. Lo que transcurre en el drama subraya la transitoriedad y la mutabilidad de la condici?n posmoderna, la p?rdida de referentes y la futi lidad del arte deproducir un solo cuadro coherente de la misma.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.965
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0020.002
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.024
GPT teacher head0.291
Teacher spread0.267 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it