The Case of Missing Boundaries: the Postmodern Design of Buero Vallejo's "Lázaro en el laberinto"
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Este articulo muestra la ex?tencia de una tendencia posmoderna en el teatro de Buero Vallejo mediante un an?lisis de la ambig?edad temporal y espacial de L? zaro en el laberinto (1986). Buero Vallejo se empe?a en romper con el uso tradi cional del espacio y del tiempo como marcos de referencia habituales y medios de crear una narrativa coherente y totalizadora. La realidad, seg?n sugiere el t?tulo del drama, se presenta de manera desconectada. La acci?n del drama se desa rrolla simult?neamente en espacios distintos, y el presente y el pasado se (con funden con el objetivo de rechazar toda verdad absoluta y subvertir la noci?n de un punto focal estable. Ausencia y presencia, pasado y presente, rememoraci?n y olvido se entrecruzan para desafiar la validez del conocimiento ontol?gico y des estabilizar la narrativa. Lo que transcurre en el drama subraya la transitoriedad y la mutabilidad de la condici?n posmoderna, la p?rdida de referentes y la futi lidad del arte deproducir un solo cuadro coherente de la misma.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.004 | 0.008 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.011 | 0.030 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.008 | 0.006 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.006 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.006 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".