MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W585317892

From gentlemen's agreements to collective agreements : how the unionization of full time faculty members in anglophone Canadian universities has changed the management and governance structures of those universities

2003· dissertation· en· W585317892 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Joy Bennett

Bibliographic record

VenueSpectrum Research Repository (Concordia University) · 2003
Typedissertation
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicCanadian Identity and History
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCollective bargainingCorporate governanceCertificationLegislationPolitical scienceNegotiationPublic administrationCollective agreementAutonomyAcademic freedomPublic sectorHigher educationPublic relationsManagementLawEconomics
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This thesis examines the influence that unionized faculty associations have had on the management and governance structures of Canadian universities by exploring the reasons that led to certification, the certification process, and the collective bargaining history at three research level Anglophone universities. Since the 1940s Canadian labour legislation has permitted unionization and collective bargaining in the private sector, but it was only in the mid 1960s that changes in the legislation, at both the federal and provincial levels, allowed individuals in the public sector to unionize. The certification of professionals in the public sector gave Canadian university faculty associations the model they needed to consider unionization and collective bargaining as a viable means by which they might ensure academic freedom, increase faculty autonomy and improve compensation. The three universities--the University of Manitoba, Dalhousie University and Queen's University--were studied using case study methodology, which included interviews, examination of primary and secondary documentation, and textual analysis of collective agreements. In each case, the conditions under which unionization occurred have been examined, the reasons for certification analysed, and the results discussed. This study shows that unionization led in fundamental ways to changes in the governance and management structure of the universities, with authority relating to faculty personnel matters shifting from the senate to direct negotiations between the board of governors and faculty associations. As a result, significant management powers have devolved from the senior academic administrators to academic peers. The gentlemen's agreements, formerly forged during senate debates, have been replaced by negotiated collective agreements. The overall implications of these changes on the governance and management of Canadian Anglophone universities have generally been positive, but only time will tell whether they will continue to be so.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesScience and technology studies
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: Qualitative
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.213
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.002
Science and technology studies0.0020.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.025
GPT teacher head0.258
Teacher spread0.234 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designQualitative
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2003
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueSpectrum Research Repository (Concordia University)Same topicCanadian Identity and HistoryFrench-language works237,207