Bibliographic record
Abstract
Contents: Phillip Vannini: Introduction: Popularizing Research - Kip Jones: Short Film as Performative Social Science: The Story behind Princess Margaret - Anne Harris/Nyadol Nyuon: Get Tired: African Australian Cross-Cultural Dialogue and Ethnocinema - Carly Gieseler: Sturgis 2.0: Crafting a Filmic-Web Dialogue - Frank Sligo/Elspeth Tilley: Cartoons as Praxis: Negotiating Different Needs in Adult Literacy Research Reporting - Jean J. Schensul/Colleen Coleman/Sarah Diamond/Raul Pino/Alessander Rey Bermudez/Orlando Velazco/Regina Blake/Noelle Bessette: Rollin' and Dustin': The Use of Graphic Images for the Dissemination of Study Results to Participant Communities - Gregory P. Spira: Focusing on Community: Photovoice, Local Action and Global Public Engagement - Brigid McAuliffe/Bryce Merrill: Mixed-Media Storytelling Installation: Embody - Guven Peter Witteveen: Producing Multimedia Exhibits for Multiple Audiences at the Hokkaido University Museum - Vivienne Brunsden/Joe Robinson/Jeffrey Goatcher/Rowena Hill: Using Multimedia Artworks to Disseminate Psychological Research on Attacks on Firefighters - Lydia Nakashima Degarrod: Geographies of the Imagination: Engaging Audiences and Participants in Collaborative Interdisciplinary Gallery Installations - Kevin Howley: Radio: Engaging Communities through Grassroots Media - Hinda Mandell/Carol M. Liebler: Music of the Streets: Bringing Local Rappers to the Ivory Tower - Mark Neumann: Audio Documentary: Hearing Places and the Representation of Sonic Culture - John Llewellyn: The Relevance of Relevance: Why and How I Write Op-eds - Aliaa Dawoud: A Short Story about Female Characters in Egyptian Soap Operas - Joseph P. Zompetti: Persuasive Prestidigitation: Exploring the Rhetorical Power of Magical Performance in a Popular Magazine Article - Daniel Doherty: Narrating Executive Development: Using Writing as to Enrich the Coaching Dialogue - Ruth Garbutt: It's What You Do with It That Counts: Disseminating Research about Sex and Relationships Using Reports and Leaflets for People with Learning Disabilities - Phillip Vannini: Public Ethnography and Multimodality: Research from the Book to the Web - Shannon Daub: Mobilizing Research Publications to (Re)Frame Neoliberal Welfare Reform - Ann Dale/Jason Luckerhoff/Francois Guillemette: e-Dialogues: Real-Time Online Conversations - Brandy King/Michael Rich: Using Social Media to Empower Parents in the Digital Age: Ask the Mediatrician - Mike Evans/Jon Corbett: New Media, Participatory Methodologies, and the Popularization of Metis History - Jessica Lester/Rachael Gabriel: A Performance of Special Education Meetings: Theatre of the Absurd - David Jan Jurasek: Learn Dis!: A Community does Research on Itself through Playback Theatre - John Guiney Yallop/Sean Wiebe: Moving Poetic Inquiry beyond the Academy: How Two Poets Popularize Their Research - Kimberly Dark: Popularizing Research as a Career: Personal, Powerful, Political - Mark David Ryan: Tips for Generating a Media Release and Media Coverage: How the Media Ate Up My Research on Aussie Horror Movies - Mara Einstein: Publishing and Publicity: The Path to Popular Audiences - Philip A. Saunders: Reaching Mainstream Audiences: Media Tips for Academics and the Challenge of Storytelling - Christopher J. Schneider: Interacting with News Media Journalists: Reflections of a Sociologist.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".