MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W587175507

К вопросу о развитии западносибирских культур эпохи раннего средневековья

2013· article· ru· W587175507 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Гордиенко Алексей Владимирович

Bibliographic record

VenueВестник Томского государственного университета. История · 2013
Typearticle
Languageru
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicAncient and Medieval Archaeology Studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsArchaeologyGeographyPopulationSettlement (finance)SteppeQuarter (Canadian coin)Demography
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The purpose of this work is designation of one of the directions of the cultural influence which has had impact on cultural Genesis of the Western Siberian cultures of a South taiga and forest-steppe strip in the second or third quarter of I millennium AD. In our opinion, since the beginning of the I millennium AD regular infiltration here the northern population become one of the factors defining cultural-genetic development of these territories. The beginning of this process 39,5 km to In from Tyumen are recorded by us on materials of the settlement Ayginsky VIII, located in the Tyumen region of the Tyumen region. The monument is dated III century AD and Pritobolye of Yarsalinsky type of ceramics is connected with penetration of carriers of ceramics of Sarovsky of type and formation on its basis in Nizhny. Population basis on Ayginsky VIII made carriers of Yarsalinsky ceramics, other traditions connected with local or other cultures, isn't recorded. The second stage falls on the IV-V centuries when in the south of the Western Siberian woods and the forest-steppe there are carriers of ceramics of Karymsky type that is noted by researchers and which evidence of presence (judging by publications) in Nizhny Pritobolye are Kozlowski's burials of a burial ground, materials of the ancient settlement of Andryushin the small town, Small Bayryk-I, Ust-Utyak-1, etc. In Omsk Priirtyshye is allocated a burial ground Ust-Tara VII and materials of the Krasnoyarsky archaeological complex. This thesis also needs careful analysis, but, unfortunately, on it we while have no materials. In this work we will designate the third stage connected with an infiltration in the VI-VII centuries of carriers of ceramics of the Zelenogorsk type. The main influence of the Zelenogorsk culture on South taiga and forest-steppe Western Siberian territories is traced at the level of ceramic production (An ornamentation and technology). (It is possible that innovations got and into other spheres of cultures, but it is already separate subject of research). By consideration of materials of ancient settlements of the VI-IX centuries. The flame of Siberia-6, 7 and Antonovo-1 (30 km to In from Tyumen, the lake of Antonovo, grows old the Tura River) was succeeded to track considerable influence alien, northern by origin, the Zelenogorsky type of ceramics on культурогенез Molchanovsko-Andryushinskaya culture. Influence of the Zelenogorsk groups of the population in the southeast direction is considered by us in the separate work devoted to cultural ties of Surgutskoe and Tomsko-Narymskoe Priobye. Here only we will note that on the basis of the comparative analysis of Ryolkinsky and Zelenogorsk materials, the conclusion is drawn on interaction at several levels -ethnocultural contacts and the trade and exchange relations. Nature of interaction of the Zelenogorsky and also Potchevashsky population, most likely, had nature of ethnocultural contacts and the trade and exchange relations. In our opinion, considerable influence of carriers of the Zelenogorskaya ceramics affected ethnogenesis and Kushnarenkovskaya culture, the small which collection of ceramics is found at ancient settlement Antonovo-1 excavation.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.032
Threshold uncertainty score0.105

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.002
Science and technology studies0.0020.003
Scholarly communication0.0030.001
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0320.010

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.032
GPT teacher head0.229
Teacher spread0.197 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2013
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueВестник Томского государственного университета. ИсторияSame topicAncient and Medieval Archaeology StudiesFrench-language works237,207