A simple common lawyer : essays in honour of Michael Taggert
Bibliographic record
Abstract
1. Introduction Grant Huscroft, David Dyzenhaus and Murray Hunt 2. Process, Quality and Variable Standards: Responding to an Agent Provocateur Mark Aronson 3. The Legitimacy of the Rule of Law David Dyzenhaus 4. Righting Administrative Law Sian Elias 5. The 'Hidden Paw' of the State and the Publicisation of Private Law Carol Harlow 6. Against Bifurcation Murray Hunt 7. 'You Say You Want a Revolution': Bills of Rights in the Age of Human Rights Grant Huscroft and Paul Rishworth 8. Why the History of English Administrative Law is not Written Martin Loughlin 9. Mike Taggart and Australian Exceptionalism Sir Anthony Mason 10. Public Function Tests: Bringing Back the State? Janet McLean 11. A History of the Modern Jurisprudence of Aboriginal Rights - Some Observations on the Journey So Far P G McHugh 12. 'Because I Said So!' Is That Ever Good Enough?-Findings and Reasons in Canadian Administrative Law David Mullan 13. To Be or Not to Be: The Constitutional Relationship Between New Zealand and Australia Cheryl Saunders 14. Early Days Sir Stephen Sedley 15. The Killing of the Prisoners at Agincourt and a Movement from Contract to Status A W B Simpson The Writings of Michael Taggart David Dyzenhaus Murray Hunt Grant Huscroft Cheryl Saunders Mark Aronson David Mullan Paul Rishworth Paul McHugh Janet McLean Brian Simpson Carol Harlow Martin Loughlin Justice Stephen Sedley Chief Justice Sian Elias Chief Justice Anthony Maso
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.003 | 0.014 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.007 | 0.010 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.007 | 0.009 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Research integrity | 0.007 | 0.006 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.016 | 0.007 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".