MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W588624434

Investigation of Early-Onset Breakdown Phenomenon at Urban Expressway Bottlenecks in Shanghai, China

2013· article· en· W588624434 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Jian Sun, Juan Zhang, H Michael Zhang

Bibliographic record

VenueTransportation Research Board 92nd Annual MeetingTransportation Research Board · 2013
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicTraffic control and management
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsBottleneckQueueWeavingMetropolitan areaTransport engineeringChinaGeographyTraffic flow (computer networking)Drop (telecommunication)Computer scienceEngineeringTelecommunicationsOperations managementArchaeologyComputer securityComputer network
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Based on the analyses of recurring bottlenecks in Shanghai’s expressways using spatial-temporal diagram, three typical isolated bottlenecks (a lane drop, an on-ramp, and a weaving section) were selected and method of transformed curves was adopted to investigate the traffic flow characteristic using the loop detector data. The starting and ending times of the three kinds of bottlenecks, pre-queue flow (PQF), queue discharge flow (QDF) were analyzed. Finally, some conclusions were discovered that QDF was higher than PQF in bottleneck sections of lane drop and on-ramp, the average difference were 18% and 27% respectively, but the situation was different in weaving section, the average rate of reduction was 22%. The findings were obviously different from results of diverse bottlenecks in other countries (e.g. M4 motorway near London, United Kingdom, I-494 in Minneapolis, Minnesota, USA, the Queen Elizabeth Way (QEW) and the Gardiner Expressway in metropolitan Toronto, Canada), i.e., the bottlenecks in lane drop section and on-ramp bottleneck have the early-onset characteristics. At last, the reasons of early-onset breakdown were preliminarily discussed from the aspects of driving behaviors, the temporal feature of flow rate and the feature of merging.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.305
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.002
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.027
GPT teacher head0.281
Teacher spread0.254 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2013
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueTransportation Research Board 92nd Annual MeetingTransportation Research BoardSame topicTraffic control and managementFrench-language works237,207