NASIG 2001 : a serials odyssey : proceedings of the North American Serials Interest Group, Inc. : 16th Annual Conference, May 23-26, 2001, Trinity University, San Antonio, Texas
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
* Introduction * PRECONFERENCE PROGRAMS * Licensing Electronic Resources * Getting Published: Surviving in a Write Stuff or They Will Fire Environment * PLENARY SESSIONS * Chemical Publication: A Critical Evaluation * The Tempe Principles in Practice * Generation Y: A Perspective on America's Next Generation and Their Impact on Higher Education * CONCURRENT SESSIONS * Sensemaking and the Digital Librarian * Infomediaries in the Internet Era: Subscription Agents as Intermediaries and Aggregators in the Electronic Publishing World-Agents of Change and Tradition * UCITA and Fair Use: A Compatible or Combatable Relationship * New Models for Serials: Redefining the Serial and the Licensing Environment * Three-Dimensional Serials: or, How I Learned to Love Content Management on the Web * Mexican Serials: Titles, Contents, and Readers of Treasures to Tap * Licensing E-Journals: UK Style * Is XML in Your Future? * WORKSHOPS * Taming the Aggregators: Providing Access to Journals in Aggregator Databases * Journal Holdings Lists on Web Sites: Design That Non-Specialized Staff Can Build and Maintain * Articles, Articles Everywhere ... But Where? And Does It Matter? * Library Consortia: Penelope's Loom or a Positive Advance? * Outsourcing Electronic Journal Licensing and Negotiation or, How to Make E-Journal Acquisitions and Licensing Processes as Boring as Ordering Print Journals * We've Made It Available, But Is It Accessible? * Cataloging Web Resources on the OCLC-CORC: Issues Identified in an Empirical Study * New Frontiers in Reference Services: Electronic Serials Transforming Public Service * The CISTI Source/SUMO Experience at McGill University: Four Years Later * What's One to Do When Vendors, Publishers, and Aggregators Do Not Meet Your Usage Reporting Needs? DO IT YOURSELF! * The Art of Claiming * Using the ONIX Standard to Manage Serials * Measuring Electronic Journal Collections: A Homeric Struggle * Providing Web-Based Listings of Electronic Journal Titles the Low Maintenance Way or, Automating Ourselves Out of a Job * Michigan State University's Serials Journey: A Merry Little Spartan Tale of MARC Holdings * From Reception to Inception: The Story of Journal of Social Structure * Before You Cancel the Paper, Beware: All Electronic Journals in 2001 Are NOT Created Equal * Tackling the Monolith: Licensing Management at the Consortial and Local Levels * Creating a Technical Services Department Web Site: From Planning to Publishing * Serials Staffing for the 21st Century and Beyond * Jump Start Your Career in Library and Information Science * Tact and Tenacity: Dealing with Difficult People at Work * Making the Move: Serials Issues in the Migration to a New Library Management System * How to Give an Effective Presentation: or, Please Take the Mike Out of Your Mouth * Poster Sessions * 16th Annual NASIG Conference Registrants * Index * Reference Notes Included
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.005 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it