MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W589484859

One Year Early

2007· article· en· W589484859 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

venuePublished in a venue whose home country is Canada.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueBridges Conversations in Global Politics and Public Policy · 2007
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicLogistics and Infrastructure Analysis
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsBridge (graph theory)ScheduleJoint ventureJoint (building)EngineeringMileTransport engineeringStormSpan (engineering)Civil engineeringOperations researchComputer scienceBusinessGeographyMeteorology
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This article describes the project to build a new bridge to span the Cooper River in South Carolina. A design-build approach was adopted and the state contracted with a joint venture for both the design and the construction. The bridge spans a shipping lane with a history of ship collisions with previous bridges, and is located is an area prone to hurricanes and with the potential for seismic activity. This meant that the finished bridge needed to be able to withstand ship collisions, strong storms and earthquakes. The joint venture chose to design and build the bridge as a single 2.5 mile long, eight-lane span. The 570-ft-high bridge also carries a pedestrian and bicycle path. The new bridge is the longest cable stayed bridge in the Western Hemisphere. Due to the magnitude of the project, an integrated construction management solution was used to keep the program on schedule and effectively manage the disparate project elements. Some of the best practices that the joint venture implemented included: (1) the creation of a rigorous, documented, system-driven change-management process; (2) implementation of a robust technology platform for standardized communication and collaboration; (3) development of project health indicators; and (4) multiple forecasting scenarios. These best practices are credited with enabling the joint venture to complete the project 14 months early.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.718
Threshold uncertainty score0.981

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.020
GPT teacher head0.252
Teacher spread0.232 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it