MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W589935574

International law and politics of the Arctic Ocean : essays in honor of Donat Pharand

2015· book· en· W589935574 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Suzanne Lalonde, Ted L. McDorman

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typebook
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicArctic and Russian Policy Studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsArcticTreatyUnited Nations Convention on the Law of the SeaHonorPoliticsLawPolitical scienceInternational lawConventionGeographyOceanographyGeology
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Foreword by Donald McRae Co-Editor's Preface I. INTRODUCTION Donat Pharand: The Arctic Scholar Suzanne Lalonde and Ronald St. J. Macdonald II. ARCTIC OCEAN REGIONAL GOVERNANCE The Arctic Region Council Revisited - Inspiring Future Development of the Arctic Council Kristin Bartenstein Lessons Learned and Lost from Pharand's Arctic Regional Council Treaty Proposal Andrea Charron Pharand's Arctic Treaty: Would an Antarctic Treaty-style Model Work in the Arctic? Julia Jabour III. ARCTIC SHIPPING AND NAVIGATION Article 234 of the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea: Its Origins and Its Future Armand de Mestral A Note on Making the Polar Code Mandatory J. Ashley Roach A Note on the Potential Conflicting Treaty Rights and Obligations between the IMO's Polar Code and Article 234 of the Law of the Sea Convention Ted L. McDorman The United States and Arctic Straits: The Northwest Passage and the Bering Strait Donald R. Rothwell Analysis of Maritime Transit Trends in the Arctic Passages Frederic Lasserre and Olga Alexeeva IV. BILATERAL RELATIONS Canada's Arctic Waters: Comments on Circumnavigating the Legal Dispute Bernard H. Oxman Understanding the Canada-United States Arctic Relationship Elizabeth B. Elliot-Meisel The Dog in the Manger - and Letting Sleeping Dogs Lie: The United States, Canada and the Sector Principle, 1924-1955 P. Whitney Lackenbauer and Peter Kikkert Canada - Russia Relations in the Arctic - Conflictual Rhetoric, Cooperative Realities Jonathan R. Edge and David L. VanderZwaag V. SPECIFIC ARCTIC LEGAL ISSUES Does Recent Practice of the Russian Federation Point to an Arctic Sunset for the Sector Principle? Alex G. Oude Elferink Uncovered and Unstable Coasts: Climate Change and Territorial Sea Baselines in the Arctic Clive Schofield and Blanche Sas Delineation of the Outer Limits of Canada's Arctic Ocean Continental Shelf and Its Delimitation with Neighboring States: Does It Matter Which Comes First? Andrew Serdy A Note on Arctic Information Platforms and International Law Betsy Baker

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.012
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.042
Threshold uncertainty score0.084

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.012
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0020.003
Science and technology studies0.0080.007
Scholarly communication0.0100.007
Open science0.0010.004
Research integrity0.0070.007
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0110.003

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.028
GPT teacher head0.307
Teacher spread0.279 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations29
Published2015
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicArctic and Russian Policy StudiesFrench-language works237,207