International law and politics of the Arctic Ocean : essays in honor of Donat Pharand
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Foreword by Donald McRae Co-Editor's Preface I. INTRODUCTION Donat Pharand: The Arctic Scholar Suzanne Lalonde and Ronald St. J. Macdonald II. ARCTIC OCEAN REGIONAL GOVERNANCE The Arctic Region Council Revisited - Inspiring Future Development of the Arctic Council Kristin Bartenstein Lessons Learned and Lost from Pharand's Arctic Regional Council Treaty Proposal Andrea Charron Pharand's Arctic Treaty: Would an Antarctic Treaty-style Model Work in the Arctic? Julia Jabour III. ARCTIC SHIPPING AND NAVIGATION Article 234 of the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea: Its Origins and Its Future Armand de Mestral A Note on Making the Polar Code Mandatory J. Ashley Roach A Note on the Potential Conflicting Treaty Rights and Obligations between the IMO's Polar Code and Article 234 of the Law of the Sea Convention Ted L. McDorman The United States and Arctic Straits: The Northwest Passage and the Bering Strait Donald R. Rothwell Analysis of Maritime Transit Trends in the Arctic Passages Frederic Lasserre and Olga Alexeeva IV. BILATERAL RELATIONS Canada's Arctic Waters: Comments on Circumnavigating the Legal Dispute Bernard H. Oxman Understanding the Canada-United States Arctic Relationship Elizabeth B. Elliot-Meisel The Dog in the Manger - and Letting Sleeping Dogs Lie: The United States, Canada and the Sector Principle, 1924-1955 P. Whitney Lackenbauer and Peter Kikkert Canada - Russia Relations in the Arctic - Conflictual Rhetoric, Cooperative Realities Jonathan R. Edge and David L. VanderZwaag V. SPECIFIC ARCTIC LEGAL ISSUES Does Recent Practice of the Russian Federation Point to an Arctic Sunset for the Sector Principle? Alex G. Oude Elferink Uncovered and Unstable Coasts: Climate Change and Territorial Sea Baselines in the Arctic Clive Schofield and Blanche Sas Delineation of the Outer Limits of Canada's Arctic Ocean Continental Shelf and Its Delimitation with Neighboring States: Does It Matter Which Comes First? Andrew Serdy A Note on Arctic Information Platforms and International Law Betsy Baker
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".