The Oregon Multicultural Archives and the Miracle Theatre Group
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This presentation was given as part of the session Prescripts and Postscripts: Connecting Theatre Companies and Archives in the Pacific at the Northwest Archivists Conference in Vancouver, B.C. in May 2013. The description for the entire session is as follows: While some theatre companies maintain their own in-house archives or have developed relationships with archival repositories, many still struggle to remain focused on the pressing challenges of finding funding, adequate rehearsal and office space, and just trying to get the next show open. In 2009, the American Theatre Archive Project (ATAP), an initiative of the American Society for Theatre Research (ASTR), was formed to provide some much-needed assistance to theatre companies trying to care for their archival records. Deploying regional teams composed of archivists, dramaturges, and scholars throughout North America, ATAP has been steadily developing a network of resources and community of practice around theatre archives. This session will introduce conference attendees to ATAP and will feature participants who will share several projects in the Pacific Northwest that have connected theatre companies with archives in a variety of ways.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.005 | 0.005 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.025 | 0.004 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.010 | 0.006 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.016 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.004 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.076 | 0.004 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".