Pattern detection and recognition using over-complete and sparse representations
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Recent research in harmonic analysis and mammalian vision systems has revealed that over-complete and sparse representations play an important role in visual information processing. The research on applying such representations to pattern recognition and detection problems has become an interesting field of study. The main contribution of this thesis is to propose two feature extraction strategies - the global strategy and the local strategy - to make use of these representations. In the global strategy, over-complete and sparse transformations are applied to the input pattern as a whole and features are extracted in the transformed domain. This strategy has been applied to the problems of rotation invariant texture classification and script identification, using the Ridgelet transform. Experimental results have shown that better performance has been achieved when compared with Gabor multi-channel filtering method and Wavelet based methods. The local strategy is divided into two stages. The first one is to analyze the local over-complete and sparse structure, where the input 2-D patterns are divided into patches and the local over-complete and sparse structure is learned from these patches using sparse approximation techniques. The second stage concerns the application of the local over-complete and sparse structure. For an object detection problem, we propose a sparsity testing technique, where a local over-complete and sparse structure is built to give sparse representations to the text patterns and non-sparse representations to other patterns. Object detection is achieved by identifying patterns that can be sparsely represented by the learned. structure. This technique has been applied. to detect texts in scene images with a recall rate of 75.23% (about 6% improvement compared with other works) and a precision rate of 67.64% (about 12% improvement). For applications like character or shape recognition, the learned over-complete and sparse structure is combined. with a Convolutional Neural Network (CNN). A second text detection method is proposed based on such a combination to further improve (about 11% higher compared with our first method based on sparsity testing) the accuracy of text detection in scene images. Finally, this method has been applied to handwritten Farsi numeral recognition, which has obtained a 99.22% recognition rate on the CENPARMI Database and a 99.5% recognition rate on the HODA Database. Meanwhile, a SVM with gradient features achieves recognition rates of 98.98% and 99.22% on these databases respectively
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.004 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.003 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".