The One-Two Punch Boxing Workout : 12 Weeks to Knock-Out Fitness
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The One-Two Punch Boxing Workout offers readers all levels of fitness a new workout program that promises to improve their strength, speed, endurance, and agility by using proven boxing workouts that are safe, effective, and fun. (No contact is required in this workout.) The program in The One-Two Punch Boxing Workout is based on a 12-week schedule, with plenty of information and inspiration for students who want to keep going long after Week 12. The authors have targeted their audience very effectively with this book and their videotape, which was (in 2000) the first-ever fitness video selected for pay-per-view viewing in Canada. The airing of the workout was a tremendous success, and resulted in not only repeated broadcasts but in the development of additional videotapes (in production now). The fitness-boxing audience includes literally millions of people who want a solid, real-world, tough workout that will increase their speed, cardiovascular endurance, and power. In-the-ring competition, actually hitting people (or being hit), and fancy equipment are downplayed throughout the book. Although the use of some equipment is mentioned, the vast majority of the exercises can be done successfully with only a jump rope. According to industry reports, this market is large and growing: In 1999 there were nearly 1 million Americans who had participated in boxing at least once in the past 12 months. If we look cardio-kickboxing, which is perhaps a better indicator of our audience, that number rises to 7,607,000 individuals in the U.S. alone. The book assumes no prior knowledge of boxing, and is aimed squarely novices; however, many chapters include material on how to take it further for especially fit, enthusiastic, or competitive students. The authors take a safety first attitude, and realize that most of their readers just want to get in shape and find an effective program they'll enjoy and stick with.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.087 | 0.033 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".