MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W592032588

MEDICINE RIVER BRIDGE REHABILITATION

2003· article· en· W592032588 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
B Ramsay

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicTransportation Safety and Impact Analysis
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsBridge (graph theory)GirderDeckEngineeringSpan (engineering)Structural engineeringRehabilitationTruckForensic engineering
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The Medicine River Bridge is located in central Alberta on Highway 11, midway between Red Deer and Rocky Mountain House. The structure, built in 1954, is a 3-span, cast-in-place concrete girder bridge with a clear roadway of 8.5 m. With traffic volumes in the order of 5,000 AADT the bridge is an important link for local commuters to Red Deer and for oilfield traffic to west-central Alberta. Two deficiencies were identified regarding the functionality of the bridge. First, the bridges load capacity was in question due to shear cracking of the girders and second, the narrow bridge clear roadway and out-of-date bridgerails were identified as being a safety concern. An assessment of the bridge and development of rehabilitation alternatives showed that bridge rehabilitation was more economical than bridge widening or bridge replacement. A load evaluation of the bridge was carried out in accordance with the Canadian Highway Bridge Design Code. This load evaluation showed that the girders were deficient in negative moment capacity but not in shear capacity. The girders were strengthened by attaching carbon fiber reinforced plates to the bottom of the bridge deck. Existing bridgerails were upgraded by mounting a new steel HSS rail in front of the existing bridgerail posts and in line with the existing curb roadway face. To protect traffic from the ends of the bridgerail the approach rail guardrail was securely fastened to the ends of the new HSS rails and locally stiffened to meet crash test requirements. Rehabilitation of the bridge was carried out in the fall of 2002. This paper describes the deficiencies identified in the Medicine River Bridge, the assessments conducted to select an appropriate rehabilitation strategy, and the design and construction of the selected bridge rehabilitation strategy.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.743
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.009
GPT teacher head0.226
Teacher spread0.217 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2003
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicTransportation Safety and Impact AnalysisFrench-language works237,207