MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W593703648

Design and Construction of a Noise Barrier Along the Vanier Highway in Fredericton

2012· article· en· W593703648 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
David Good, D Hallden

Bibliographic record

Venue2012 CONFERENCE AND EXHIBITION OF THE TRANSPORTATION ASSOCIATION OF CANADA - TRANSPORTATION: INNOVATIONS AND OPPORTUNITIES · 2012
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldHealth Professions
TopicNoise Effects and Management
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsNoise barrierNoise (video)Roadway noiseAmbient noise levelEnvironmental scienceNoise controlNoise levelMeteorologyComputer scienceAcousticsNoise reductionGeographyTelecommunicationsPhysics
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In 2003, exp was retained by the New Brunswick Department of Transportation (NBDOT) to complete a noise study along a 1.3 km section of the Vanier Highway located within the City of Fredericton. This four-lane access controlled section of highway with a posted speed limit between 90 and 100 km/h is adjacent to a residential area and accommodates 26,100 vehicles daily. With increasing complaints from residents adjacent to the highway, the Department wanted noise levels identified, along with possible mitigative measures to reduce the noise levels. Utilizing 13 noise sensitive areas (NSAs) that had been identified in a previous study, along with ambient noise levels at these NSAs, a noise model was developed that predicted the ambient noise levels. This model reflected the US Federal Highway Level 2 Noise Prediction Method which has been accepted by the NBDOT in their Highway Noise Policy. Based on the predicted ambient noise levels, the noise model was then utilized to identify the effectiveness of different noise barrier heights. A height was selected and the noise barrier constructed. Prior to construction in 2010, existing ambient noise readings at the 13 NSAs were taken. Readings were then taken following construction in 2011 to measure the effectiveness of the noise barrier in reducing noise levels. This paper describes the process that was used to define existing noise levels, the height of noise barrier to be constructed, the effectiveness of the noise barrier once construction was completed, and the associated cost. (A) For the covering abstract of this conference see ITRD record number 201211RT334E.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.481
Threshold uncertainty score0.980

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.046
GPT teacher head0.275
Teacher spread0.229 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2012
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venue2012 CONFERENCE AND EXHIBITION OF THE TRANSPORTATION ASSOCIATION OF CANADA - TRANSPORTATION: INNOVATIONS AND OPPORTUNITIESSame topicNoise Effects and ManagementFrench-language works237,207