Bibliographic record
Abstract
Acknowledgments Abbreviations Introduction: A Critical Heritage BENJAMIN LEFEBVRE A Note on the Text 1. Lucy Maud Montgomery 1874-1942 (1966) ELIZABETH WATERSTON 2. Fair World of L.M. Montgomery (1973) HELEN PORTER 3. Anne of Green Gables and the Regional Idyll (1983) T.D. MACLULICH 4. Little Orphan Mary: Anne's Hoydenish Double (1989) </pROSAMOND BAILEY 5. Subverting the Trite: L.M. Montgomery's Room of Her (1992) MARY RUBIO 6. Women's Oral Narrative Traditions as Depicted in Lucy Maud Montgomery's Fiction, 1918-1939 (1993) DIANE TYE 7. L.M. Montgomery's Rilla of Ingleside: Intention, Inclusion, Implosion (1994) OWEN DUDLEY EDWARDS 8. Decoding L.M. Montgomery's Journals / Encoding a Critical Practice for Women's Private Literature (1994) HELEN M. BUSS 9. Fitted to Earn Her Own Living: Figures of the New Woman in the Writing of L.M. Montgomery (1995) CAROLE GERSON 10. Pruned Down and Branched Out: Embracing Contradiction in Anne of Green Gables (1995) LAURA M. ROBINSON 11. Finding L.M. Montgomery's Short Stories (1995) REA WILMSHURST 12. L.M. Montgomery's Manuscript Revisions (1995) ELIZABETH EPPERLY 13. My Secret Garden: Dis/Pleasure in L.M. Montgomery and F.P. Grove (1999) IRENE GAMMEL 14. Writing with a Definite Purpose: L.M. Montgomery, Nellie L. McClung and the Politics of Imperial Motherhood in Fiction for Children (2000) CECILY DEVEREUX 15. Kinship and Nation in Amelia (1848) and Anne of Green Gables (1908) (2002) MONIQUE DULL 16. Maud Squad (2002) CYNTHIA BROUSE 17. The Golden Road of Youth: L.M. Montgomery and British Children's Books (2004) JENNIFER H. LITSTER 18. Women at War: L.M. Montgomery, the Great War, and Canadian Cultural Memory (2008) ANDREA MCKENZIE 19. Anne of Green Gables / Akage no An: Flowers of Quiet Happiness (2008) EMILY AOIFE SOMERS 20. Archival Adventures with L.M. Montgomery or, As Long as the Leaves Hold Together (2012) VANESSA BROWN AND BENJAMIN LEFEBVRE Sources Bibliography Index
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.004 | 0.016 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.003 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.011 | 0.008 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.012 | 0.010 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.006 |
| Research integrity | 0.005 | 0.007 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.095 | 0.030 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".