MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W59471501 · doi:10.1096/fasebj.21.5.a29

α‐synuclein in activated microglias during infarct‐induced Wallerian degeneration

2007· article· en· W59471501 on OpenAlexaff
Jian‐Qiang Lu, Han Kyu Lee, Alim P. Mitha, Gernot Neumayer, Minh Dang Nguyen

Bibliographic record

VenueThe FASEB Journal · 2007
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldNeuroscience
TopicNeuroinflammation and Neurodegeneration Mechanisms
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Calgary
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMicrogliaWallerian degenerationSynucleinopathiesPhagocytosisAutophagyNeuroinflammationCell biologyLysosomePinocytosisInflammationUbiquitinPathologyChemistryLipofuscinEndocytosisBiologyImmunologyAlpha-synucleinMedicineCellBiochemistryApoptosisParkinson's disease

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abnormal aggregation of α‐Synuclein (αS) drives cell loss and produces intracellular inclusions in synucleinopathies, which may be due to insufficient degradation resulting from either a dysfunctional ubiquitin‐proteasome system (UPS) or a constant production of mutated αS that overwhelms the UPS. Recent in vitro studies suggest that the autophagy‐lysosome pathway is also involved in αS degradation. On the other hand, synucleinopathies are associated with microglial activation and infiltration. In this postmortem study, we aimed to investigate the relationship between microglial activity and αS disposition in serial patients with cerebral infarct‐induced Wallerian degeneration (CI‐WD) of the corticospinal fibers. Immunoreactivity for αS was found in activated microglias localized in the CI‐WD regions of seven patients (mean 65.6 ± 9.3 years), but not five neuropathologically normal subjects (mean 70.4 ± 8.0 years). No immunoreactivity for ubiquitin or neurofilament protein was present in the microglias. Confocal analysis of double‐immunofluorescence staining confirmed the colocalization of αS with the microglial marker. Our results suggest endocytosis (phagocytosis and/or pinocytosis) of αS into activated microglias during the process of CI‐WD. This finding indicates that αS may alternatively undergo microglia‐associated lysosomal proteolysis for degradation.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.002

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.037
GPT teacher head0.263
Teacher spread0.226 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2007
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe FASEB Journal→Same topicNeuroinflammation and Neurodegeneration Mechanisms→French-language works237,207→