MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W595544668

Naming Rights: Legacy Gifts and Corporate Money

2008· book· en· W595544668 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Terry Burton

Bibliographic record

VenueMedical Entomology and Zoology · 2008
Typebook
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicNonprofit Sector and Volunteering
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPrivate sectorPolitical sciencePublic relationsLaw
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

About the Author. Preface. Getting Started. About This Book. Introduction. Chapter 1. Escalating Price Tags. Legacy Gift And Naming Rights. Acquisition Targets In The Private Sector. Private Sector Escalating Price Tags. NHL Arena Naming Rights. Pro Sports Stadiums Naming Rights Chart. National Basketball Association . The British Are Coming, The British Are Coming. Chapter 2. Nonprofit Sector Naming Rights. Higher Education and Named Gifts. School of Business. Naming Rights at Business Schools Come with the Ask. Legacy Gifts to name other schools. Benchmarking Named Gifts to Universities. University & College Athletics. Private Schools. Religious Schools. Health Care Sector. Healthcare Naming Rights offerings. Arts & Culture Naming Rights. Comparing Named Gifts in the Arts. Interview with Paul Schervish, Director, Center on Wealth and Philanthropy, Professor, Department of Sociology at Boston College. Chapter 3. Changing Strategies for Length of Term Naming Rights (Nonprofit Sector). Bundle Up--Bundle Out. New York Philharmonic Orchestra. Multi-Tier Choices of Endowed Chairs in the Arts & Culture sector. Donors like the tunes as Endowment grows: 59% Solution offers Multi-Year choices. The 59% Solution? Growing the Endowment a capital idea. Multi-Year Choices for Major Gift Donors. Limited Term Naming Rights Private Sector. Nonprofit Sector. Sunset effect. Annual Naming Rights. Chapter 4. Higher Level of Involvement and Expectation from Donors. Boosting brand name with stadiums & sponsorships. Microsoft. McDonalds. Recent Corporate Building Naming Deals. Branding discussion with Robert Passikoff (President of Brand Inc.). Chapter 5. Corporate Naming Rights Aim to Boost Brand. Boosting brand name with stadiums and sponsorships. Microsoft. McDonalds. Recent Corporate Building Naming Deals. Branding discussion with Robert Passikoff (President of Brand Inc.). Chapter 6. Nonprofits Jump the Queue to Acquire Naming Rights. Chapter 7. Legacy Gifts Mount Up in Billion Dollar Campaigns. Legacy Gifts Given Just for the Sake of Making the Gift. Chapter 8. Changing Attitude in Setting the Price Tag for Naming Rights. 51% of Historical Cost. Benchmarking. Manager's Toolbox - How to develop a Benchmark Report. Step One. Step Two. Step Three. Step Four. Existing Facilities. Chapter 9. Using the Internet to Market Naming Rights. Shopping List Technique. Descriptive Text Approach. Campaign Videos on the internet. Recognition for sponsors. Chapter 10. Spread of Naming Rights. Naming Rights Offered for sale. Canada's Emerging Trends in Naming Rights. Other recent Naming Rights Deals in Canada. Epilogue. Risk Analysis. Appendices. Appendix A. Named Stadiums Around the World as of September 2007. Appendix B. Endowment Gifts Comparison Table. Appendix C. United States Named Facilities. Index.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesScience and technology studies, Research integrity
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.691
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.004
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0020.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.028
GPT teacher head0.285
Teacher spread0.258 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations8
Published2008
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueMedical Entomology and ZoologySame topicNonprofit Sector and VolunteeringFrench-language works237,207