MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W595849520

Running for their lives : girls, cultural identity, and stories of survival

2000· book· en· W595849520 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Sherrie A. Inness

Bibliographic record

VenueRowman & Littlefield Publishers eBooks · 2000
Typebook
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicYouth Education and Societal Dynamics
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsGirlShadow (psychology)Gender studiesSomaliShameIdentity (music)DreamHistorySociologyPsychoanalysisArtArt historyPsychologyAestheticsPolitical scienceLawDevelopmental psychology
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Chapter 1 Chapter Acknowledgments Chapter 2 Chapter Introduction: Girl Problems Sherrie A. Inness Chapter 3 Acknowledgments Chapter 4 Introduction: Girl Problems Part 5 I: Dancing the Bashenga: Girls Confront Racism Chapter 6 1 Coming to America: Not the Movie by Eddie Murphy Chapter 7 2 From Foutou to French Fries: Life on the Edge of African and American Cultures Chapter 8 3 Mommy I just want to fit in!: An African Girl's Story Chapter 9 4 Childhood Misconceptions: Reflections of a Biracial American (Colored) Girl Chapter 10 5 Mah-Rukh Ali: Profile of a Norwegian Chapter 11 6 Fighting Shame: A Somali Single Teen Mother in Canada Part 12 II: Don't Look Down: Girls Living on the Edge Chapter 13 7 A Tightrope Made of Sari Silk: The Delicate, Perilous World of Girlhood in India Chapter 14 8 Afia's Story: A Guide to Survival Chapter 15 9 A Tryst Missed: Girlhood in Pakistan Chapter 16 10 Horizontal Rain: Road from Sarajevo Chapter 17 11 Charley Lauren's Story: Growing-up in the Shadow of Mental Illness Chapter 18 About the Contributors

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.005
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: Qualitative
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.016
Threshold uncertainty score0.034

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.005
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.002
Science and technology studies0.0160.015
Scholarly communication0.0130.009
Open science0.0010.008
Research integrity0.0020.006
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0100.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.059
GPT teacher head0.332
Teacher spread0.273 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designQualitative
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2000
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueRowman & Littlefield Publishers eBooksSame topicYouth Education and Societal DynamicsFrench-language works237,207