Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Preface. Acknowledgments. Contributors. Quality of Life. How we think (deeply but with limits) about quality of life: The necessity of wisdom for aging P.J. Whitehouse, J. Ballenger, S. Katz. Ethics and quality of life in the elderly F. Lolas. Palliative Care. Palliative care: A weak link in the chain of civilized life L.L. Emanuel. Assisted Death. Assisted death in the Netherlands and its relationship with age G.K. Kimsma. Why euthanasia should not be legalized: A reflection on the Dutch experiment H. Jochemsen. Managing death: End-of-life charades and decisions G.P. Smith, II. Challenges and dilemmas in the 'aging and euthanasia' policy cocktail R.S. Magnusson. Suicide. End-of-life decisions in terminal illness: A psychiatric perspective L. Sherr, F. Starace. Suicide: Implications for an aging society N. Watanabe, M. Taguchi, K. Hasegawa. Research Ethics. Research on elderly subjects: Striking the right balance A. Schafer. Community consent for research on the impaired elderly D.C. Thomasma. Regulating ethical research involving cognitively impaired elderly subjects: Canada as a case study G.F. Tomossy, D.N. Weisstub, S. Gauthier. Index.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it