Fanon & education : thinking through pedagogical possibilities
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Contents: Carl Grant: Foreword - George J. Sefa Dei/Marlon Simmons: The Pedagogy of Fanon: An Introduction - George J. Sefa Dei: Rereading Fanon for His Pedagogy and Implications for Schooling and Education - Camille Logan: Body Politics and the Experience of Blackness within the Field of Education - Katie Aubrecht: Rereading the Ontario Review of the Roots of Youth Violence Report: The Relevance of Fanon for a Critical Disability Studies Perspective - Paul Adjei: Resistance to Amputation: Discomforting Truth about Colonial Education in Ghana - Donna Outerbridge: The Fact of Blackness: A Critical Review of Bermuda's Colonial Education System - Rory Crath: Reading Fanon in Homosexual Territory: Towards the Queering of a Queer Pedagogy - Francisco J. Villegas: Strategic In/Visibility and Undocumented Migrants - Marlon Simmons: Concerning Modernity, the Caribbean Diaspora, and Embodied Alienation: Dialoguing with Fanon to Approach an Anticolonial Politic.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.007 | 0.016 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.008 | 0.010 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.018 | 0.002 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".