MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W597615453

Possible bearers of rights and duties

2002· book· en· W597615453 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Carl Wellman

Bibliographic record

VenueRoutledge eBooks · 2002
Typebook
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicReligion, Ecology, and Ethics
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMonismAnimal rightsHuman rightsLawPolitical sciencePhilosophyEnvironmental ethicsReligious studiesTheology
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Right-Bearers Tooley, Michael. Abortion and Infanticide Philosophy & Public Affairs 2 (1972): 37-65. Warren, Mary Anne. On the Moral and Legal Status of Abortion The Monist 57 (1973): 43-61. Feinberg, Joel. The Rights of Animals and Unborn Generations, in Philosophy & Environmental Crisis, edited by William T. Blackstone (Athens GA: University of Georgia Press, 1974): 43-68. Wade, Francis C., Potentiality in the Abortion Discussion Review of Metaphysics 29 (1975): 239-255. MacCormick, Neil, Children's Rights: A Test-Case for Theories of Right ARSP 62 (1976): 305-316. Frey, R. G. Animal Rights Analysis 37 (1977), pp. 186-189. Murphy, Jeffrie G. Rights and Borderline Cases Arizona Law Review 19 (1977), pp.228-241. McCloskey, H. J. Moral Rights and Animals Inquiry 22 (1979), pp. 23-54. Baier, Annette. The Rights of Past and Future Persons, in Responsibilities to Future Generations: Environmental Ethics, edited by Ernest Partridge (Buffalo NY: Prometheus Books, 1981): 171-183. Regan, Tom. Justice and Equality, Chapter 7 in The Case for Animal Rights, edited by Tom Regan (Berkeley: University of California Press, 1983): 232-265. Wellman, Carl. The Growth of Children's Rights ARSP 70 (1984): 441-453. Elliot, Robert. Moral Autonomy, Self-Determination and Animal Rights The Monist 70 (1987): 83-97. Reaume, Denise. Individuals, Groups, and Rights to Public Goods University of Toronto Law Journal 38 (1988), pp. 1-27. Duty-Bearers Garvin, Lucius. Obligation and Moral Agency Ethics 58 (1948): 188-194. Prichard, Michael S. Responsibility, Understanding, and Psychopathology The Monist 58 (1974): 630-645. Copp, David. Collective Actions and Secondary Actions American Philosophic Quarterly 16 (1979): 177-186. French, Peter A. The Corporation as a Moral Person American Philosophical Quarterly 16 (1979): 207-215. Sapontzis, S. F. Are Animals Moral Beings? American Philosophical Quarterly 17 (1980), pp. 45-52. Smith, Robert J. The Psychopath as Moral Agent Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 45 (1984), pp. 177-193. Oshana, Marina A. L. Ascriptions of Responsibility American Philosophical Quarterly 34 (1997): 71-83. Davis, N. Ann. Moral Agency, Individual Responsibility, and Human Psychology Public Affairs Quarterly 12 (1998), pp. 51-78. O'Neill, Onora. Kant on Duties Regarding Nonrational Nature Aristotelian Society Supplementary Volume 72 (1998): 211-228.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.010
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.011
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.019
Threshold uncertainty score0.062

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0100.011
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0020.001
Science and technology studies0.0060.038
Scholarly communication0.0110.014
Open science0.0020.009
Research integrity0.0060.005
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0190.003

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.034
GPT teacher head0.289
Teacher spread0.255 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2002
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueRoutledge eBooksSame topicReligion, Ecology, and EthicsFrench-language works237,207