MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W599335915

The federal nation : perspectives on American federalism

2008· book· en· W599335915 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Iwan Morgan, Philip Davies

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typebook
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicAmerican Constitutional Law and Politics
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsFederalismNew FederalismPolitical sciencePoliticsDual federalismDevolution (biology)Public administrationCooperative federalismLawSociology
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

PART I: AMERICAN FEDERALISM IN NATIONAL AND COMPARATIVE PERSPECTIVE Federalism, the Bush Administration, and the Evolution of American Politics T.Conlan What a Difference a Few Decades Make: American Conservatism, Constitutional Issues, and the Bush Presidency J.D.Aberbach & G.Peele Canada's Open Federalism: Past, Present, and Future Tense C.Dunn PART II: AMERICAN FEDERALISM IN TRANSITION Three Faces of Contemporary American Federalism J.Kinkaid Fragmented Structures and Blurred Boundaries: Strategies for Regional Governance C.W.Stenberg Congressional Devolution of Powers J.Zimmerman PART III: AMERICAN FEDERALISM AND INEQUALITY Hurricane Katrina and the Persistence of Racially Structured Federalism K.Johnson The Politics of the State Children's Health Insurance Program D.Jaenicke & A.Waddan Understanding the Politics of Rights in a Punitive Era: Indigent Defense 1972 to the Present A.Worden & A.Davies PART IV: AMERICAN FEDERALISM AND SOCIAL ISSUES Gay Rights, the Marriage Protection Amendment, and the States E.Ashbee Clearing the Air: The New Politics of Public Smoking in the US C.J.Bailey Abortion, the Judiciary, and Federalism in North America R.McKeever Federalism and American Federal Education Policy J.Parker

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.030
Threshold uncertainty score0.090

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.003
Science and technology studies0.0080.011
Scholarly communication0.0060.007
Open science0.0010.002
Research integrity0.0040.005
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0080.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.026
GPT teacher head0.302
Teacher spread0.276 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations19
Published2008
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicAmerican Constitutional Law and PoliticsFrench-language works237,207