Disability Management and Workplace Integration: International Research Findings
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Contents: Disability management: an introduction, Henry G. Harder and Thomas Geisen Part I Theory and Empirical Research in Disability Management Practice: Workplace disability management as an instrument for human resources and organizational development, Thomas Geisen Using action research to develop effective disability management programs, Christine Randall and Nicholas Buys The role of workplace social support in disability management, Gregory C. Murphy and Mary A. O'Hare Changes in managing disability at the workplace in Germany: chances of professionalization?, DA rte Bernhard, Mathilde Niehaus and Britta Marfels Human rights and duty to accommodate in employment: perspectives from Canada, Daniel Huang, Shannon L. Wagner and Henry G. Harder How to deal with disability-related diversity: opportunities and pitfalls, Stephan A. BA hm, David J.G. Dwertmann and Mirian K. BaumgArtner. Part II Disability Management in Various Countries: The development of disability management in China, Ignatius Tak Sun Yu, Dan Tang, K.K. Chan, F.K. Ip and Karen Y.L. Lo-Hui A framework for success: CRS Australia's approach to disability management, Alison Angelton Disability management: new methodology to support workplace reintegration in Belgium, Marthe Verjans, An Rommel, Elizabeth Tijtgat and Katrien Bruyninx Workplace disability management: findings of an empirical investigation of Swiss companies, Thomas Giesen, Annette Lichtenauer, Christophe Roulin and Georg Schielke European perspectives on disability management (1999a 2009): insights and developments, Donal F. McAnaney. Part III Illness, Rehabilitation and Disability Management: Occupational integration management at the Enzensberg Clinic, Joachim Maier and Gisela Riedl Disability management or orthopaedic disorders: a pilot project, Lutz Trowitzsch, DA(c)sirA(c)e Herbold, Bernhard Koch and Birgit-Christiane Leineweber Occupational stress and mental illness: an overview for disability managers, Shannon L. Wagner and Henry G. Harder Type 2 diabetes in the workplace: perspectives in Canada and United States, Mamdouh Shubair Index.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.005 | 0.012 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.006 | 0.018 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.004 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.006 | 0.005 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.006 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.018 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".