Bibliographic record
Abstract
Introduction / Janice Foley Part 1: The Equity Struggle - Past and Future 1 Gendering Union Renewal: Women's Contributions to Labour Movement Revitalization / Jan Kainer 2 Too Bad, You Were Too Late Coming In! / Marie-Josee Legault Part 2: The Equity Struggle - Black Trade Unionists Speak Out 3 Confronting Racism in the Canadian Labour Movement: An Intergenerational Assessment / Miriam Edelson 4 Equity in Unions: Political Correctness or Necessity for Survival? / Carol Wall 5 Are We There Yet? The Struggle for Equity in Canadian Unions / Marie Clarke Walker Part 3: Equity, Solidarity, and Union Renewal 6 Bargaining for Economic Equality: A Path to Union Renewal, Then and Now / Anne Forrest 7 Developing a Conceptual Model of Equity Progress in Unions / Janice Foley 8 Cross-Constituency Organizing: A Vehicle for Union Renewal / Linda Briskin Part 4: International Perspectives on Equity and Union Renewal 9 Gender Politics in Australian Unions: Gender Equity Meets the Struggle for Union Survival / Barbara Pocock and Karen Brown 10 Sites for Renewal: Women's Activism in Male-Dominated Unions in Australia, Canada, and the United States / Mary Margaret Fonow and Suzanne Franzway 11 The Representation of Women and the Trade Union Merger Process / Anne McBride and Jeremy Waddington 12 Old Tracks, New Maps? The Meaning of Women's Groups for Trade Union Revival in Britain / Jane Parker Index
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.004 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.011 | 0.006 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.012 | 0.006 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.004 |
| Research integrity | 0.004 | 0.003 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.078 | 0.006 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".