Strange sisters : literature and aesthetics in the nineteenth century
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Contents: Francesca Orestano: Introduction - Luisa Cale: Belinda and Exhibition Culture: Fiction, Pictures and Imaginary Ekphrasis - Maria Luisa Roli: A Voyage by Balloon: Stifter's Condor - Lucy Bending: 'Fishing in a Strange Element': Harriet Martineau and the Visible World - J.B. Bullen: Mid-Nineteenth-Century British Primitivism and the Continent of Europe - Paola Spinozzi: Journeying through Translation: Dante among the Victorians, Dante Gabriel Rossetti in Medieval Italy - Francesca Orestano: Across the Picturesque: Ruskin's Argument with the Strange Sisters - Alberta Gnugnoli: Famous Men and Fair Ladies: Genius, Creativity and Beauty in the Portraits of Julia Margaret Cameron - Francesca Frigerio: Out of Focus: A Portrait of Charles Lutwidge Dodgson, a.k.a. Lewis Carroll - Graham Smith: Michelangelo's Duke of Urbino in Literature, Travel-Writing and Photography of the Nineteenth Century - Marialuisa Bignami: Sir Joshua and the Historian: Portraits in George Eliot's Daniel Deronda - Hilary Fraser: Through the Looking-Glass: Looking like a Woman in the Nineteenth Century - Elisa Bizzotto: Blurring the Confines of Art and Gender: Aubrey Beardsley's Legend of Venus and Tannhauser, 'The Fragment of a Story' - Linda Goddard: Gauguin's Guidebooks: Noa Noa in the Context of Nineteenth-Century Travel-Writing - Alexandra Harris: The Antimacassar Restored: Victorian Taste in the Early Twentieth Century.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it