MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W601121746 · doi:10.1520/stp14359s

Dewatering Structures in High Water Content Materials

2000· book-chapter· en· W601121746 on OpenAlexaff
I. R. McDermott, AD King, CMT Woodworth-Lynas, Patricia Lefeuvre

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typebook-chapter
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicEnhanced Oil Recovery Techniques
Canadian institutionsPetro-CanadaCentre For Cold Ocean Resources EngineeringMemorial University of Newfoundland
Fundersnot available
KeywordsDewateringContent (measure theory)Water contentMaterials scienceProcess engineeringEnvironmental sciencePulp and paper industryGeologyMathematicsGeotechnical engineeringEngineeringMathematical analysis

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This paper describes the behaviour of soft soils created by the rapid deposition of a sediment slurry and the mechanisms by which pore fluid escapes from the consolidating bed. Such rapid deposition occurs as a result of dumping dredge spoils at sea or in the case of disposing of mine tailings in settling ponds. Soft soils may experience a variety of natural deformations during consolidation. Consolidation-related structures are commonly observed in settling column experiments, geotechnical centrifuge tests and in the field. This paper deals with the specific class of soft-sediment intrusive and extrusive dewatering structures called respectively pillars and boils (or sediment volcanoes) that form spontaneously through self-weight consolidation. Dewatering structures were formed during self-weight consolidation centrifuge experiments of a naturally-occurring marine sediment under the influence of high “g” conditions. A description of the phenomenon is given, describing the geometry and nature of the dewatering structures observed, and highlights some of the soil physical properties and depositional conditions which appear to control the formation of the structures. This phenomenon is believed to have relevance to dredge spoil and mine tailing disposal, and to the safe handling and disposal of polluted high water content soil like wastes.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.007

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.015
GPT teacher head0.191
Teacher spread0.176 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2000
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicEnhanced Oil Recovery Techniques→French-language works237,207→