Bibliographic record
Abstract
This symposium will focus on the interface between biomaterials and host-tissue. Prosthetic dentistry is innately characterized as rehabilitation medicine with dental prostheses, including dental implant, made up of various kinds of biomaterials. The biomaterials form interfaces with the host-tissues like as teeth, oral mucosa and bone. Chemical, physical or mechanical interaction at the interface between biomaterial and tissues can, more or less, cause some sort of biological reactions, which relates essentially to the outcomes of the treatments. Thus, it is becoming considerable to comprehend the mechanisms of interactions at the interface and their importance for prosthetic dentistry. Dr. Yoshida, who is featurcd as one of the lecturers, and Professor Minagi, the chair of scientific committee of JPS, proposed the plan of'-this inteilnational symposium, featuring Professor Brunette at UBC, Professor Duyck at K. U. Leuven and Professor Yoshida as representatives of interface researchers. Details of their lectures in the symposium and their backgrounds are clearly described in their abstracts. At the symposium, I will introduce the outline of the inteilface researches as a chairDerson based on the Interface Oral Health Sciencei'2) wixich has been proposed by Tohoku University ~raduate School of Dentistry as the new concept of dentistiy since 2002, and the research proruotion project Highly-ftinctional Interface funded by the Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology. The latter p~'oject is proceeding as a multidisciplinary research project among Tohoku University Graduate School of Dentistry and Institute for Materials Research, Kyushu University Research Institute for Applied Mechanics from 2007 to 201 1 . The further approaches and directions of the interface researches will be discussed. It will be meaningful for regulating the interface acceptable and valuable to prosthetic dentistry. Furtherrnore it is helpful to open a vista for creating noble interfaces with bio-ftmction. l ) Interface Oral Health Science, Watanabe M, Takahashi N, Takada H. eds. Amsterdam: Elsevier, 2005. 2) Interflace Oral Health Science 2007, Watanabe M and Okuno O, eds. Tokyo: Springer, 2007. Optimizing Tissue-implant Interfacial Interaetions by Implant Surface Topography Donald M Brunette Professor, Dept. of Oral Biological and Medical Sciences Faculty of Dentisty University of British Columbia Vancouver, B.C. Canada
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.010 | 0.003 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".