MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W602934289 · doi:10.1090/coll/061

The Endoscopic Classification of Representations

2013· book· en· W602934289 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueColloquium Publications - American Mathematical Society/Colloquium Publications · 2013
Typebook
Languageen
FieldMathematics
TopicAdvanced Algebra and Geometry
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Toronto
Fundersnot available
KeywordsIndex (typography)BibliographyTable (database)Computer scienceArtificial intelligencePattern recognition (psychology)MathematicsData miningLibrary scienceWorld Wide Web

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

We shall outline a classification [A] of the automorphic representations of special orthogonal and symplectic groups in terms of those of general linear groups. This necessarily includes a classification of local L-packets of representations. It also requires a classification of the extended packets that are the local constituents of nontempered automorphic representations. Our description will be brief. In particular, we will restrict it to quasisplit ∗ orthogonal and symplectic groups G, even though at least some of the results can be extended (not without effort) to inner twists of G. The methods rest ultimately on two comparisons of trace formulas. One is the spectral identity that is the end product of the stabilization of the trace formula for G. This was established some years ago [A1], under the assumption of the fundamental lemma. It now holds without condition, thanks to the work of Waldspurger [W1][W2], the recent breakthrough by Ngo [N], and the extensions of Chaudouard and Laumon [CL1] [CL2]. The other is the spectral identity given by the stabilization of the twisted trace formula for GL(N). This formula is still conditional. The relevant twisted fundamental lemmas are now known [W3], [W4], at least up to the twisted variants of [CL1] and [CL2]. The problem is to develop twisted generalizations of the techniques of [A1] and related papers. Until this is done, the results we describe here have also to be regarded as conditional. We take F to be a local or global field of characteristic 0, and G to be a quasisplit, special orthogonal or symplectic group over F. Then G has a complex dual group G, and a corresponding

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.008
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesScience and technology studies, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.072
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.008
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.002
Bibliometrics0.0010.006
Science and technology studies0.0020.004
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0040.001
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.045
GPT teacher head0.341
Teacher spread0.296 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it