Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Editorial (Helen Castle). Emergence in Architecture The Emergence and Design Group, Morphogenesis and the Mathematics of Emergence (Michael Weinstock,). Frei Otto in Conversation with the Emergence and Design Group. Finding Exotic Form: An Evolution of Form Finding as a Design Method (Michael Hensel). Types, Style and Phylogenesis Farshid Moussavi and Alejandro Zaera Polo of Foreign Office Architects in conversation with the Emergence and Design Group. Fit Fabric: Versatility Through Redundancy and Differentiation The Emergence and Design Group. Evolutionary Computation and Artificial Life in Architecture: Exploring the Potential of Generative and Genetic Algorithms as Operative Design Tools (Dr Una-May O'Reilly, Martin Hemberg and Achim Menges). Drunk in an Orgy of Technology (Professor Chris Wise). Engineering Design: Working with Advanced Geometries Charles Walker of Arup & Partners in conversation with the Emergence and Design Group. Manufacturing Complexity Johann Sischka of Waagner Biro in conversation with the Emergence and Design Group. Morpho-Ecologies: Approaching Complex Environments (Achim Menges). Biodynamics Professor (George Jeronimidis). Biographies. Interior Eye Retail in the Dumpster (Craig Kellogg). Building Profile The Kunsthaus at Graz (Jeremy Melvin). Practice Profile Dale Jones-Evans (Leon van Schaik). Engineering Exegesis Blurring the Lines: The Chesa Futura (Andre Chaszar). From Political Reportage to Pret-a-Porter (Eleanor Curtis). Book Reviews. Supercrit #1 and #2 (Samanths Hardingham). Book Club. Site Lines: A Sort of Homecoming: The Art Gallery of Ontario (Sean Stanwick).
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.005 | 0.003 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it