The Canadian Election Studies: Assessing Four Decades of Influence
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Introduction: Four Decades of Canadian Election Studies / Mebs Kanji, Antoine Bilodeau, and Thomas J. Scotto Part 1: The Narrative 1 Point of Departure, 1965 / John Meisel 2 Theoretical Perspectives in the Canadian Election Studies / Mildred A. Schwartz 3 To Ann Arbor ... and Back: A Comparative Perspective on Election Studies / Lawrence LeDuc 4 Advancements in Methodology: A Recurring Process / Thomas J. Scotto, Mebs Kanji, and Antoine Bilodeau 5 The Relevance and Future of the Canadian Election Studies / Richard Johnston and Andre Blais Part 2: Taking Stock 6 An Overview of the Social Dimension of Vote Choice / Elisabeth Gidengil 7 Eclipse of Class: A Review of Demographic Variables, 1974-2006 / Barry Kay and Andrea M.L. Perrella 8 Quebec versus the Rest of Canada, 1965-2006 / Richard Nadeau and Eric Belanger 9 The Structural Bases of Canadian Party Preference: Evolution and Cross-National Comparison / Richard Johnston 10 The Valence Politics Model of Electoral Choice / Harold D. Clarke and Allan Kornberg 11 Voting Turnout in a System of Multi-Level Governance / Jon H. Pammett Part 3: Conclusion 12 The Future of the Canadian Election Studies / Antoine Bilodeau, Thomas J. Scotto, and Mebs Kanji Appendix: Four Decades of Publications Based on the Canadian Election Studies Index
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.004 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".