Bibliographic record
Abstract
PREFACE CHAPTER 1: Rule of Law Lon L Fuller, The Morality That Makes Law Possible Declaration of Independence Constitution of the United States Bill of Rights Sandra Day O'Connor, 'We Need a Clear Set of Rules to Reaffirm Our Values as a Nation Lera Boroditsky, How Does Our Language Shape the Way Think? CHAPTER 2: Stories Tell: Law as Narrative Bobby DeLaughter, Closing Argument: State of Mississippi v. Byron De La Beckwith Supreme Court of the United States, DeShaney v. Winnebago County Department of Social Services Dennis Barrie, The Scene of the Crime Ohio Revised Code 2907.32, Pandering Obscenity Patricia Ewick and Susan S. Silbey, Dwayne Franklin PBS Frontline, Interview with Captain Mike Gauldin CHAPTER 3: When Law Comes to Campus In the Supreme Court of the United States, Oral Arguments in Morse v. Frederick Mark Walsh, Ruling in 'Bong Hits' Case Seen as Leaving Protection for Students' Free Speech Stanley Fish, Clarence Thomas is Right Brendan O'Neill, The Left Has Been Infected by the Disease of Intolerance Kevin Hoffman, Students Say Hate Crimes Created Campus Unity University of Wisconsin-Whitewater, We Are All People Forum CHAPTER 4: Can My Avatar Serve My Sentence?: Real Laws in a Virtual World Lawrence Lessig, The Path of Cyberlaw Office of the Privacy Commissioner of Canada, Google Contravened Canadian Privacy Law, Investigation Finds David Kravets, Feds Demand Prison For Guns N' Roses Uploader Government's Position Re Presentence Report and Sentencing for Defendant in re US v. Cogill, aka, Skwerl Defendant's Position re Sentencing in re US v. Cogill Phil Davis, Second Life Avatar Sued Over Virtual Sex Device Daniel J. Solove, Do Social Networks Bring the End of Privacy? CHAPTER 5: Reconsidering Laws: In Search of Global Values Robert Draper, Failing Nations: Why Things Fall Apart Fund for Peace, United States Country Profile, 2007 Universal Declaration of Human Rights Chinese (Mandarin) Translation Anna Dolidze, Burger Without Spies, Please: Notes from a Human Rights Researcher Philip K. Howard, The Freedom to Take Risks Editors of Tikkun Magazine, A Platform for Love and Generosity: Law & Justice
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".