Bibliographic record
Abstract
Introduction: New Challenges for Power Sharing Ian O'Flynn ((Lecturer in Politics at the University of Newcastle upon Tyne) and David Russell (Policy Officer at the Northern Ireland Community Relations Council, Research Associate, Democratic Dialogue, Belfast and Research Associate, The Centre for Lebanese Studies, University of Oxford) Part 1. Conceptual Issues 1. Democratic Values and Power Sharing Ian O'Flynn 2. Integration and Autonomy: Minority rights and Political Accommodation Tom Hadden (teaches human rights and conflict resolution at Queen's University Belfast as a part-time Professor of Law) 3. Breaking Antagonism? Political Leadership in Divided Societies Duncan Morrow (Chief Executive Officer of the Northern Ireland Community Relations Council) 4. Electoral Systems Design and Power-Sharing Regimes Stefan Wolff (Professor of Political Science at the University of Bath) Part 2. Case Studies 5. The Failure of Moderate Politics: The Case of Northern Ireland Anthony Oberschall (Emeritus Professor at the University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill) and L. Kendall Palmer ((Lecturer in Politics at the University of Newcastle upon Tyne) 6. The Unintended Consequences of Consociational Federalism: The Case of Belgium Kris Deschouwer (Professor of Politics at the Vrije Universiteit Brussel) 7. Partial Implementation, Partial Success: The Case of Macedonia Florian Bieber (Senior Non-resident Research Associate of the European Centre for Minority Issues, Belgrade. He teaches at Central European University (Budapest), the University of Sarajevo and the University of Bologna) 8. The Dichotomy of International Mediation and Leader Intransigence: The Case of Bosnia and Herzegovina Marie-Joelle Zahar (Assistant Professor of Political Science at the Universite de Montreal) 9. Power Sharing and National Reconciliation: The Case of Lebanon David Russell and Nadim Shehadi (Director of the Centre for Lebanese Studies, an independent academic research institution affiliated to the Middle East Centre at St Antony's College, Oxford University) Part 3. Deepening Democracy 10. Overlapping Identities: Power Sharing and Women's Rights Rachel Rebouche (Juris Doctorate Candidate at Harvard Law School) and Kate Fearon (founder member of the Northern Ireland Women's Coalition, an adviser to its Northern Ireland Peace Talks negotiation team and adviser to its Assembly Members in the First Northern Ireland Assembly) 11. Below and Beyond Power Sharing: Relational Structures across Institutions and Civil Society Manlio Cinalli (Jean Monnet Fellow at the European University Institute, Florence, and Research Fellow at the University of Leeds) 12. The Challenge of Reconciliation in Post-conflict Societies: Definitions, Problems and Proposals Brandon Hamber (Research Associate of Democratic Dialogue, Belfast) and Grainne Kelly (Research Associate of Democratic Dialogue, Belfast) 13. Towards a Civic Culture: Implications for Power Sharing Policy Makers Robin Wilson (Director of the Belfast-based think tank Democratic Dialogue) List of Contributors Index
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.008 | 0.009 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.010 | 0.044 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.015 | 0.022 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.010 |
| Research integrity | 0.005 | 0.007 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.016 | 0.002 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".