The worth of the social economy : an international perspective
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Contents: Marie J. Bouchard: Introduction. The Worth of the Social Economy - Marie J. Bouchard: Methods and Indicators for Evaluating the Social Economy - Bernard Perret: Evaluating the Social Economy. Clarifying Complex Rationality - Bernard Enjolras: The Public Policy Paradox. Normative Foundations of Social Economy and Public Policies. Which Consequences for Evaluation Strategies? - Bernard Eme: Miseries and Worth of the Evaluation of the Social and Solidarity-based Economy. For a Paradigm of Communicational Evaluation - Nadine Richez-Battesti/Helene Trouve/Francois Rousseau/Bernard Eme/Laurent Fraisse: Evaluating the Social and Solidarity-Based Economy in France. Societal Balance Sheet-Social Utility and Identity Trial - Marie J. Bouchard: The Evaluation of the Social Economy in Quebec, with regard to Stakeholders, Mission and Organizational Identity - Roger Spear: Social Accounting and Social Audit in the UK - Charles Patrick Rock: Evaluating Nonprofit Organizations in the United States Welfare System - Mauricio Serva/Carolina Andion/Lucila Campos/Erika Onozato: Evaluation of the Social Economy in Brazil. An Analysis of the Practices in some NGOs - Isabel Nicolau/Ana Simaens: The Evaluation of Social Solidarity Organizations in the Portuguese Context - Akira Kurimoto: Evaluation of Co-operative Performances and Specificities in Japan - Marie J. Bouchard/Nadine Richez-Battesti: Conclusions.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it