MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W610831423

Effect of Body Weight on the Disposition of Flunixin Meglumine and Gentamicin in Miniature Horses and Quarter Horses

2014· article· en· W610831423 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueSHAREOK (University of Oklahoma; Oklahoma State University; Central Oklahoma University) · 2014
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicAntibiotics Pharmacokinetics and Efficacy
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersOklahoma State University
KeywordsDispositionGentamicinQuarter (Canadian coin)AntibioticsBiologyPsychologyMicrobiologyGeographySocial psychology
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In most species, large variations in body size necessitate dose adjustments based on an allometric function of body weight. Despite the substantial disparity in body size between Miniature Horses and light-breed horses, there are no studies investigating appropriate dosing of any veterinary drug in Miniature Horses. The purpose of this study was primarily to develop a basis for pharmacologic scaling in the horse, and to determine the scaling exponents with which flunixin meglumine and gentamicin relate to body weight in the horse. A secondary purpose was to evaluate the current status of the therapeutic monitoring of gentamicin in the United States and Canada. To investigate pharmacologic scaling, a standard dose of flunixin meglumine was administered intravenously to eight Miniature Horses and eight Quarter Horses, and three-compartmental analysis was used to compare pharmacokinetic parameters between breed groups. The total body clearance of flunixin was 0.97�0.30 mL/min/kg in Miniature Horses and 1.04�0.27 mL/min/kg in Quarter Horses. Similarly, a standard dose of gentamicin was administered intravenously to eight Miniature Horses and eight Quarter Horses, and three-compartmental analysis was used to compare pharmacokinetic parameters between breeds. The total body clearance of gentamicin components C1a, C2, C1, and summed components was 0.68�0.15 mL/min/kg, 0.69�0.16 mL/min/kg, 0.72�0.17 mL/min/kg, and 0.71�0.16 mL/min/kg respectively in Miniature Horses and 0.59�0.10 mL/min/kg, 0.61�0.09 mL/min/kg, 0.62�0.10 mL/min/kg, and 0.62�0.09 mL/min/kg respectively in Quarter Horses. There were no significant differences between Miniature Horses and Quarter Horses in clinically significant pharmacokinetic parameters (P>0.05) for either flunixin meglumine or gentamicin. An email-based survey disseminated to each of the veterinary teaching hospitals in the United States and Canada revealed that 42% of respondents currently perform therapeutic drug monitoring of aminoglycosides, with an average of 3.9 samples annually. The majority of veterinary TDM is performed in equine medicine. The fact that TDM is performed infrequently in veterinary teaching hospitals is at odds with the importance of TDM for aminoglycosides as demonstrated in human medicine. In conclusion, both flunixin meglumine and gentamicin may be administered to Miniature Horses at the same dose rates used typically in light-breed horses, with similar recommendations for TDM of gentamicin.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.281
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.003
GPT teacher head0.181
Teacher spread0.178 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2014
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueSHAREOK (University of Oklahoma; Oklahoma State University; Central Oklahoma University)Same topicAntibiotics Pharmacokinetics and EfficacyFrench-language works237,207